Just in case someone hadn't already done it.
http://http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner.html?74vc57l9i8l0qxxpgobpdo900=1m10101001501521s1r11r10
Just in case someone hadn't already done it.
http://http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner.html?74vc57l9i8l0qxxpgobpdo900=1m10101001501521s1r11r10
Just in case someone hadn't already done it.
Made your thingy little cheaper - http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…=1m10101001501521s1r11r10
Also mine thingy- http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…=1m10101001501521s1r11r10
Lower output but higher 2.33 eff.
Made your thingy cheaper than before - http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…=1m10101001501521s1r11r10
Gave up making it even cheaper.
Cheaper and 1 chamber less.
Cheaper ? Lies ! If he already has 4 chambers (i assume so), it is cheaper to use that "cheaper than before".
Cheaper ? Lies ! If he already has 4 chambers (i assume so), it is cheaper to use that "cheaper than before".
IT IS CHEAPER, you safe Iron, Copper and Tin. It has 3 chambers and only uses 1 cooling more cell and 1 extra HD.
IT IS CHEAPER, you safe Iron, Copper and Tin. It has 3 chambers and only uses 1 cooling more cell and 1 extra HD.
I think you missed "If he already has 4 chambers" part.
Edit: also i was pointing out that you should say "More expensive and/but 1 chamber less" or just "Cheaper".