If a Windmill produces > 5 EUt, there's a chance proportional to the EU-5 for the Windmill to break of being overpowered.
Breaking > Returns some iron ingots, turns into Generator.
If you place Windmills high, you will have good chances for them to break on first thunderstorm.
Sounds are known to cause lag, disable them for now. But wait, I've never heard about reducing the source limit reducing lag.
That's the reason for that config option to begin with.
but could be more difficult to code.
Nope, there's not much of a difference between checking "block below" or "block adjacent".
Increase support range is possible, up to 15 blocks per se. Dunno which value i pick.
Probably will permit "sticking to wall" with a lower support range.
as in, "stick to wall" ~5 blocks support
Placed on ground/pillar ~10 block support
Uhm, Scaffolds are slower then ladders, aren't that easy to hit whilst falling and don't contain the shift-stop functionality.
These are all intended disadvantages of Scaffolds, ensuring Ladders don't loose their purpouse.
Possibly. imo, it turns the engineering side of minecraft up to 11, but at the cost of the artistic side (without rp2 micro-blocks or alot of effort, the average IC2 factory is pretty ugly looking). My thanks to the team as well for providing this option.
Efficiency > graphics.
Since we got near-unlimited block ids soon, this wont be an issue though
Sounds neat. Will use another block ID, but THAT shouldnt pose a problem after 1.2
Ah, so you're "is supposed to" meant "This functionality is supposed to work, i cannot tell why it doesn't and will probably check the code again" and not "It's supposed to not do that".
Probably check whether the Energy Consumption for one shear operaton exceeds the amount of energy a Batpack can provide. Aka transfer limit.
Damnit, forgot about Java using signed per default... Jep, will be fixed.
Is supposed to
Doesn't make sense though.
Is this a limitation of the forge hook?
Yes, that's why you override them.
Thank you, Is there any way i could add them now? or will i have to wait.
Download the images from wiki, copypaste them into the correct locations on the spritesheet located in ic2 jar :§
As well, APIs are meant to be sole-standing... With that API you cant do anything, because TileEntityMachine isnt a component of the API.
It's impossible to API stuff like that... because we can only hand out hooks for strictly defined operations... which actually equals 1 Upgrade each we could just implement instead.
F.e. crops were coded with API in mind from the very beginning, that's the reason their API is considerable mighty.
nolifers detected...
there is no reason to play minecraft solo.
Off-Topic detected.
Issue will be fixed, NPEs are annoying, but usually easy to find.
@Cable idea: Would require more rewrite then implementing flat panels+solar generators.
@Lightcheck: Nope.
If only "one sinle" block is checking for light, people WILL start stacking multiple layers of solars above each other.
If only "a single block of all" gets covered and is meant to blackout the system, it would still require all bocks to check for light > no gain.
Picking a random block of a system and asking it to do a lightcheck could work. But as mentioned alreaydy, lightchecks don't use CPU anymore, but are static calls upon a simple array provided by the base engine.
Already discussed in betatester section.
Implementing compacted solar panels would make solar panels even more overpowered, by nullifying their space requirements.
I tinker with the idea of altering the way solarpanels work (one main panel, to which you attach a set of smaller "panels" (flat)) to make them use less CPU while still requiring (Even more) space.
java.lang.NullPointerException
at ee.TilePedestalRenderer.a(TilePedestalRenderer.java:29)
at ee.TilePedestalRenderer.a(TilePedestalRenderer.java:20)
Definitely not an IC issue.
This was meant to be fixed back around 1.60.
As well, its not a dupe bug, it's just a crash messing up your saves.
Given we fixed the last bug, would you mind dropping the errorlog resultng this time? It's probably a different oversight related to the same issue.
