Posts by MithosFall

So I was testing out some systems involving IndustrialCraft 2, Buildcraft 3.1.3, and the BC - IC2 crossover mods. After some success, I decided an explosion was in order. 8 nukes and a reinforced bunker later, this is the results. Note: This may shock the younger audience. Viewer discretion is advised. (lol)

Glad to see it, Direwolf. I loved your first Let's Play and am excited to see what's in store this time. =)

Quote from Snipedz

Update for 1.0 would be nice as soon as possible.

I'm sure it would be. Useless comments would be nice if not posted too.

Give us the ModLoader.txt information. That will likely help.

Username / Nickname - MithosFall, Mithos, and Xero are all names I commonly go by. =)
MC-Forum & Minecraft Username - MithosFall | IC-Forum Username - Xero
Timezone - GMT -5 | EST
Position - I would like to be a spriter on the design team.
Experience - Instead of posting links, I'll just post some images of sprites I've done.

My portfolio (lol) may not look very impressive but I assure you that I can do what's asked of me regarding sprites. Feel free to test me if you like. =)

--------------

EDIT: Oh, yeah. I forgot; I also made some custom graphics for some of Minecraft's textures as well as textures in Minecraft mods (for personal use). If you'd like me to post them, I can. I thought they looked a bit better than the original.

Quote from Alblaka

It's rather the fact i'm (as it's lead developer) currently extremely limited regarding free time, due to the SWProject for my studys ^^'. We're gonna work on the port next up (given no hotfixes for 1337 are ned).

It's cool, man. Take your time.

What I like having in Minecraft is many blocks with GUIs in my house like the Crafting Table. The enchanter and potion lab is what I like most about 1.0.0. Also the fact that there's an end goal now.

I'm not sure what you mean by "Forge spritesheet" but I'm gonna act like a n00b and give you a 16x16 png file. This is the sprite I came up with.

I changed the first two designs and created two more. What do you guys think?

Having 65 EU/t with no heat is nice, but bloody expensive and inefficient with your design. Not good in the long run, at least not for me.

The setup you created isn't bad at all. It would, in fact, be a good reactor design for a beginner.

However, if you are looking for more efficiency and have enough resources, I would suggest taking a look at my second reactor design. It adds 2 more Reactor chambers than yours and has a few more of each item in the design. It's a Mark 2-7, which means that it'll continually generate EUs for 7 whole cycles and at 50 EU/t. So long as you're not automatically refilling it for 8 or more times in a row, you should be fine. This is a safe and pretty efficient design that I would recommend.

Xero's Reactor Designs

Hello, I'm new to the IC forums, though I've been using IC2 for a little while. I think I might be pretty good at designing reactor configuration, but that may be proven wrong. Anyway, all of these designs are original. I dunno if these have been produced before or not, but I worked them out on the Reactor Planner. I take criticism, just be nice.

Here's what I have.

Reactor Design #1 - Standard (Revised)

Specs:
Type - Mark II-1
EU/t - 60
Total EU Output - 12,000,000
Efficiency - 3
Maximum Consecutive Cycles - 1.64

Click for design

Reactor Design #2 - Long Life (Revised)

Specs:
Type - Mark II-E (9)
EU/t - 50
Total EU Output - 10,000,000
Efficiency - 2.5
Maximum Consecutive Cycles - 9.80

Click for design

Reactor Design #3 - 6 Cell (Revised)

Specs:
Type - Mark II-1
EU/t - 70
Total EU Output - 14,000,000
Efficiency - 2.33
Maximum Consecutive Cycles - 1.63

Click for design

Reactor Design #4 - 3 Cell Budget (Revised)

Specs:
Type - Mark II-1
EU/t - 35
Total EU Output - 7,000,000
Efficiency - 2.33
Maximum Consecutive Cycles - 1.13

Click for design