So I was testing out some systems involving IndustrialCraft 2, Buildcraft 3.1.3, and the BC - IC2 crossover mods. After some success, I decided an explosion was in order. 8 nukes and a reinforced bunker later, this is the results. Note: This may shock the younger audience. Viewer discretion is advised. (lol)
Posts by MithosFall
-
-
Glad to see it, Direwolf. I loved your first Let's Play and am excited to see what's in store this time. =)
-
Update for 1.0 would be nice as soon as possible.
I'm sure it would be. Useless comments would be nice if not posted too.
-
Give us the ModLoader.txt information. That will likely help.
-
Username / Nickname - MithosFall, Mithos, and Xero are all names I commonly go by. =)
MC-Forum & Minecraft Username - MithosFall | IC-Forum Username - Xero
Timezone - GMT -5 | EST
Position - I would like to be a spriter on the design team.
Experience - Instead of posting links, I'll just post some images of sprites I've done.
My portfolio (lol) may not look very impressive but I assure you that I can do what's asked of me regarding sprites. Feel free to test me if you like. =)--------------
EDIT: Oh, yeah. I forgot; I also made some custom graphics for some of Minecraft's textures as well as textures in Minecraft mods (for personal use). If you'd like me to post them, I can. I thought they looked a bit better than the original.
-
It's rather the fact i'm (as it's lead developer) currently extremely limited regarding free time, due to the SWProject for my studys ^^'. We're gonna work on the port next up (given no hotfixes for 1337 are ned).
It's cool, man. Take your time.
What I like having in Minecraft is many blocks with GUIs in my house like the Crafting Table. The enchanter and potion lab is what I like most about 1.0.0. Also the fact that there's an end goal now.
-
I'm not sure what you mean by "Forge spritesheet" but I'm gonna act like a n00b and give you a 16x16 png file. This is the sprite I came up with.
-
I changed the first two designs and created two more. What do you guys think?
-
Having 65 EU/t with no heat is nice, but bloody expensive and inefficient with your design. Not good in the long run, at least not for me.
-
The setup you created isn't bad at all. It would, in fact, be a good reactor design for a beginner.
However, if you are looking for more efficiency and have enough resources, I would suggest taking a look at my second reactor design. It adds 2 more Reactor chambers than yours and has a few more of each item in the design. It's a Mark 2-7, which means that it'll continually generate EUs for 7 whole cycles and at 50 EU/t. So long as you're not automatically refilling it for 8 or more times in a row, you should be fine. This is a safe and pretty efficient design that I would recommend.
-
Hello, I'm new to the IC forums, though I've been using IC2 for a little while. I think I might be pretty good at designing reactor configuration, but that may be proven wrong.
Anyway, all of these designs are original. I dunno if these have been produced before or not, but I worked them out on the Reactor Planner. I take criticism, just be nice.Here's what I have.
Reactor Design #1 - Standard (Revised)
Specs:
Type - Mark II-1
EU/t - 60
Total EU Output - 12,000,000
Efficiency - 3
Maximum Consecutive Cycles - 1.64Reactor Design #2 - Long Life (Revised)
Specs:
Type - Mark II-E (9)
EU/t - 50
Total EU Output - 10,000,000
Efficiency - 2.5
Maximum Consecutive Cycles - 9.80Reactor Design #3 - 6 Cell (Revised)
Specs:
Type - Mark II-1
EU/t - 70
Total EU Output - 14,000,000
Efficiency - 2.33
Maximum Consecutive Cycles - 1.63Reactor Design #4 - 3 Cell Budget (Revised)
Specs:
Type - Mark II-1
EU/t - 35
Total EU Output - 7,000,000
Efficiency - 2.33
Maximum Consecutive Cycles - 1.13
