Wait lava? I though it was something more like a portable recycler, oh well nvm.
Posts by FenixR
-
-
At the cost of energy or gtfo.
-
did you read this thread at all before posting? cause it certainly sounds like you skipped to the end and commented on the last post with out thinking.
You should know by now that NOBODY that post a stupid comment like the above ever reads anything.
-
*Facedesk* X 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000... *3years later* ...00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000...
If you didn't know (Of course you didn't fudging know), there have already been several suggestion about a stupid replicator before, all where bad ideas and you should be ashamed of... i better stop here, go on now before i snap.
-
-
As I see renewable Forestry liquids will be forbidden in that generator...
Not a problem because it has a special generator.Forestry have his own EU generator for these liquids so why bother? LoL.
-
Where is the "Not this shittu again" option?
-
THAT won't pose an issue. Even vanilla furnaces can simply store "one value".
IC is already using that one value to supply whole cans of fuel... the number really doesn't care which value you assign to it. There won't be an issue with using one unit of BC-oil to provide X fuel points.Adding the ability to pour multiple cans of fuel in would be possible... But I'm not sure whether it's within the range of what the Generator is intended to do.
How about we put this on the list for a special generator, which is meant to run off fuel, gas (if implemented) and BC oil, using said materials in a higher efficiency then the normal generator (if at all) with a higher EU output, probably about 30 EUt, too compensate for the incapability to burn simple stuff (wood, coal) as well as the fact you're using complex and limited fuel materials.Sounds good, and maybe it will finally shut up the complainers that say Coal/Bio Fuel isn't worth it.
-
Although now that i think about it, i think i know why Richard said it was impossible to do it.
BC fuel has a static energy value for both of their liquids, unlike IC2 which can have a different array of energy value for the fuel can because 6 Coalfuel Cells or 6 Biofuel Cells aren't the only recipe for fuel that you can use in the canner.
-
Thats for BC-IC Interaction, but what about adding the internal fuel storage to the generator? (Not only for BC Fuel, but for IC2 Fuel too)
-
-
FENIXR! I choose you!
Use Hyper-PWN!Sorry i think the memo saying i was supposed to act as a pokemon never reached my hands :/.
Also Greg has the whole code of the miner ask him to post it here too.
For everything else, USE THE FUDGING CONFIG FILE!
That is all, FenixR Out.
-
Who knows, i remember reading some kind of suggestion in the RedPower thread in the MCF, of a child who asked why steve could not be miniaturized and sended over the RP Tubes, and eloraam kinda loved the idea.
-
yeah, almost as crazy as an electric jetpack or matter generator
And where exactly are you getting your info for what's planned for future updates?
Jetpack Introduced Uses Fuel
Electric Jetpack Introduces Uses EU instead of Fuel, weaker than the regular jetpack.Whats so crazy about that again?
And i just ignore the existence of the matter generator for the most part of my game, only remembering i needed it for iridium and then forget it exist again. The most annoying machine in the game.
And i get my info from this forum, believe it or not i can actually read!
-
you have a better idea? please share instead of bitching about my post. be CONSTRUCTIVE.
They are lots of "better" ideas in this particular subforum, not exactly the best or even good ideas, but certainly better than this one.
Like people have said, no plans of anything better than lappack its on the works or will be on the works for that matter, and a nuclear reactor as a backpack? Oh boy i would stop smoking if i where you since it sound like the worst idea ever both logically (I Mean a fudging Nuclear reactor in a backpack?! Poor steve. didn't know he was radiation man...) and game experience (Again, a fudging Nuclear Reactor as a backpack! I would have passed if it where something like a windmill backpack or a watermill backpack but a nuclear reactor backpack?!) speaking.
-
I talked from experience, last time i used the miner i had to add those 5 things manually in the config file for it to mine them.
-
If I ever bother to code it, this feature will come as the Hazard Suits helmet, given you free air whilst diving in water or lava.
Come to think of it, can one actually DROWN in lava, assuming you don't take fire damage?
I think so, i think i remember seeing the oxygen bar once when i "dived" into lava once (That shit its impossible since you can barely see something while sumerged in lava)
-
The hazard suit was supossed to be made out of rubber, i doubt that would have been too much expensive. And if you only wanted to bring his attention to know if the idea was forgotten or not, a simple PM would have worked, heck i bet it would work a lot better than a thread in a forum we don't really know how often he reads carefully.
-
This is a good idea but... This will make storage blocks unstackable. Like Batteries/Crystals/Lapotrons. As it would need NBT Tags.
I still don't know if NBT-Tags can be used on blocks, due to them becoming some sort of entity upon placing. With that said i don't really know if what the OP wants its actually possible.
-
... No just no, The rebreather idea was "In theory" already accepted by alblaka months ago, why bother bringing it to the surface again?
Well though out or not, in the end its the dev team whos going to implement the idea so they may or may not follow 100% of what its said in the original suggestion thread, so "Re-Presenting" this idea its just as useless.
