Posts by FenixR

Quote from passinglurker

there could be a problem with people gaming the system by using proxies and setting up multiple accounts to shut down threads they don't like

Ergo why it should be done by admis personally, if they see a thread have too many negative votes and the comments confirm those negative votes they close the thread. If they see the negative votes but the comments are positive they would leave the thread as it is or ask why there are so much negative votes and just delete them (The negative votes) or something.

In the end thats only a little extra, the real motive of the poll is to stop people just saying "+1" in a thread.

You! Stop with the double-triple posting already, Sebra im also looking at you >.>

And that "..." only post was HIGHLY unncesesary.

Quote from jppk1

A single uranium cell produces two million EU alone, two cells next to each other produce eight million. The reactor masters are competing on who fails the most on reactor math and nerfing reactors...

Thats the joke of the efficiency system of uranium cells, if they are consumed faster by placing them nearby they would produce less energy making them less efficient, maybe even less than when placed alone. And like i told you, if you cut the number of cycles/tick the uranium cells give, then the damage done to the nuclear reactor and the internal components would be a lot less because you are cutting the number of cycle/ticks.

Just for your information, if you ask me to shut up politely or not simply because you are "Fed up" with the topic, i swear i will emerge from your PC monitor and do a Ozzy Osbourne on your head.

This is a forum, we are in our right to express our opinion how we like it to, even if its on a annoying topic such as this. As long as it doesn't break any rules of the forum. As long as someone have something to say about the matter, they are in their right to do so.

And for the record i always consider that one should make a suggestion with the mindset of convincing solely the dev team that its something worth to do it. If other people follow then fine, if not then defend your suggestion with all that you have so it doesn't get stomped (Like i so much like to do :D). For a reason its a forum that people can discuss stuff in, it would make no sense to have a one side discussion otherwise...

Oh, and the part about not wanting someone to tell you how to play can be applied the other way too, the other side would like to play the game in a different way beyond some number tweaking only, and the only way to do so is by convincing the dev team to change the game or someone to make a addon or something for it. In the end, its just a matter of which side have the more support going for them, and right now the conservationist side is winning.

If they get depleted faster, then the amount of damage done to the reactor and the components will be lower and everything should be re-scaled/balanced to work with it, so no.

Quite honestly, i got kinda overwhelmed by the amount of code and classes in there that i have only read it. Maybe one of these days i may code something for minecraft (Already have some ideas in the oven but i need to understand that shit so i do it right XD)

Quote from sliderpro

Yeah,there surely IS something what is sure - everything needs maintaince.Solar panel (panel itself) gets dirty over time.Depending on their working mechanics,the need oil for cylinder,highest quality water,inside wire replacements..man,tons of everything.

My idea is having different recepies for solar panels,like long unforgotten 2 copper cables and generator for basic/cheap/whatever you call it/ solar,then our modern recepie,and some *higher quality* solar. Maybe,each of them could produce slightly different eu/t.
But the point is,having durability for machines,like for tools or having a *sure* working time and after that,possibility of breaking.It seems more-or-less realistic.
Another idea is to add scheme of *insides* of a machine,where working parts of machine can be checked.So,if some thing break,you replace it and everything is ok.That seems even more realistic.

Well i guess if you are going to nerf one machine under the basis of "Maintenance" to keep everything realistic to captain realism, then every single machine in the game should also be affected by this. Tools and nano/quatum armor may or may not get something like this because its annoying to code something to keep track of when to maintain it and shit (Although according to alblaka, NBT Tags solves everything equipment related)

afaik gold is used in three things:

-Circuits, gold is a pretty good electric conductor.
-Jewelery and Decoration because it looks pretty.
-Currency, since its fucking expensive.

Maybe some chemistry here and there, but im not too sure.

I suggest that every new thread in the Suggestion Subforum gets an automatic poll saying:

-I Approve/Support this idea.
-I don't approve/support this idea.
-I don't particularly care either way.
-*Facepalm* (This one is just for my amusement)

Also if a suggestion gets enough votes in the Don't approve or *Facepalm* option it should be immediately closed and/or moved to the archive (This should be done personally by a admin so it doesn't get abused, but i guess its fine if you want to make it automatic)

With this maybe the "+1" only comments would stop and cleaning the suggestion subforum would be a little less annoying.

Isn't "SNEAK" clicking pretty specific? I mean only one space/storage space can be assigned with "Sneak" clicking iirc.

Quote

+1.
Nothing else to say.

Then don't say anything O.o? Honestly if i were a administrator i would see the "+1" comments with no futher comment as spam.

Some recipes are going to be updated in the next update (Don't have the specifics yet, check one of my threads in the suggestion forum to get the gist of it).

Also golden chandeliers? What is this Terraria? Come on, at least suggest a scorching lamp like those used in digging sites or what not, not stuff that came from the sixteen century >.>

Quote from Impossible4

The amount of tin required to make a can is proposterous. and unless you are using equibalent exchange it can be hard to get enough tin to get all of the rotten flesh out of your inventory http://forum.industrial-craft.…f/images/smilies/mfsu.png

... Someone call the president, a Satellite Laser Facepalm is need for this and we need him to push the button...

The amount is FINE, 15 tinbars for 12 cans that you can REUSE its good enough.

Unless you want to stack every single type of food under Tin Cans, i don't see the need to make more of those.

Its a game, we don't need to have a 100% realistic shit in here.

About this idea, i don't particularly care.

Quote from passinglurker

what part of "this childish debate needs to stop" DIDN'T YOU UNDERSTAND!?! the OP and all nerfers/buffers are probably aware that "take it up with your server admin" is the new social norm so you comments are not helping and they will only perpetuate this pointless debate to the point of flamewar

Even if this thread is closed, the debate will most likely arise somewhere in the future. Until a middle ground is reached i doubt it will ever die. Anyway i agree this thread needs to be closed now.

Sounds dumb to me, but whatever.

Quote from MatLaPatate

Or that would be cool if fuel can be created as a liquid (as in BC)--> Produce EU from biofuel wouldn't cost Tin.

IC2 doesn't have its OWN (Keyword) Liquid pipes. As long as that fact stays true, i doubt the IC2 team will make that change. (ZERO Dependencies with other mods and all those shenanigans)

Because scrap boxes also includes a lot of other crap, you can't expect that your machine, who digs for especific materials (Ores in this case) to have the same rates at the scrap box, at best it should either have lower rates and/or a chance per cobble to not get anything.

And please, stop spamming the same suggestion/concept already, if you need to JUST FUDGING EDIT THE FIRST POST AND TITLE, its annoying seeing you have spammed the same concept like 4 times already.

The IC2 Api is there, if pchan wants to include electrical power it just need to include the api in his mod and do the proper calls.

Don't expect any from the IC2 Dev team will bother making a patch/plugin to that mod (Unless one of the devs also uses that mod and likes it).

Quote from Two

I suggest the following change:
- Change recipe for tin cans to use only 2 tin bars (same recipe as making a stick out of wood) and return 8 tin cans. This would transform tin into cans at the same rate as cells.

What? Are you high? 8 cans for only 2 bars? No just no. Besides you only need to have 10 of those cans unless you lose them so the actual recipe its good enough, 15 tin bars its all you will need, and you can't complain tin is scarce because its fucking not.

Quote from Two

- Have a filled tin can restore 2.5 hearts (same as bread).

Nope either, Tin cans are supposed to be a perfect, Zero waste source of food. Before minecraft change it, food could not stack but it was different with the tin cans. IF you can't stand wasting 5-8 secs eating all the food you need then your time must be too valuable and i don't know wtf you are playing this game in the first place.

Quote from Two

- Change some of the canning recipes accordingly to keep them in line with the increased heart restoring, e.g. it would require 2 rotten flesh now to fill up one tin can or 3 melon slices.

See above. Also like someone stated above, Tin cans give a lot of saturation, a secondary food stat that prevents you from speeding through your reserves, think of it as a invisible food bar.

Quote from passinglurker

so does any one know how eloraam reacted to thaumcrafts vis->blulectric power converter? personally the addon that got banned caught my attention simply because it had melon batteries

READ!!!, it was mentioned several times in this thread. Also isn't this considered a necro?