Lol, I also hate the RM for that ... but it does not mean it hasn't to be ^^.
Also, same behavior of Rolling machine can be observed on Rock Crusher.
Yep, but apart from using exploit, who really use the Rock Crusher ? 
Posts by MatLaPatate
-
-
A better Idea than the mine (just a little bit more laggy, but that's not huge ^^) would be a low decreasing of energy stored. (based on percentage). But ... with what I said, I also said it would need buffing Fuel based gen, but not Green one ^^.
But, more than a buffing Fuel based generator things, this would also makes people able of running as many machines as they have generators (so Green Gen would be a bit nerfed, because you would need 3 solar pannels for one non overclocked macerator running at full time ^^).More generally, the idea was more to promote vast energy network, as it has to be done IRL because electricity can't be stored in a proper way (a part from using lake as rechargeable battery, which would be quite fun in MC, without Infinite Water ...)
-
The problem is there's not really a practical way to *not* use a storage system (maybe you could wire a specific machine right up to the power plant, such as the fabricator, but the whole workshop?)
You want a way NOT TO use (for the grammar rule ^^) storage system ? Just consume every EU produced, which means in fact: produce what you need. --> Fuel based generators
-
newcomer
Lol. Friendly term for "noob" ?
-
Sorry I was really just testing how fast I would be banned. I already haw ic2 and am playing the hell out of it
And ... you think Feanturi/Team Devs aren't busy enough to make that test, which is completly useless ?
-
But what I don't understand is I'm still not banned
Just seeing how quick it would be.Because nobody reported you. They just thought you were very stupid, and felt the need of being friendly with you. As they would be with 2 years old baby. Seriously, trolling ... is just annoying.
-
"An impossible error has occured!"
LOL. But you know, as a french phrase says: Impossible isn't french. (It's from Napoleon Bonaparte ^^)
-
I think BC Energy is kinetic/pneumatic one (it would have huge losses for transfer if so, so let's say it's kinetic, working with gears, but ... it doesn't look like gears ^^).
So, to me, converting EU to MJ should be made with an Electrical Engine (Forestry ^^) and MJ to EU, a Dynamo. But I also would like storing EU with Electrolyzed Water ^^.
As for storing EU/MJ with liquid, I think something fun would be using Liquid Sodium, then using it (once heated and smelted) to power RailCraft stuff, or Thermal Generator (GregTech ^^) or just Geothermal. But ... as for conversion, it would only work for EU-->MJ -
Just so you know, I keep proposing that UE upgrades fix the crucial flaw in IC2 upgrades, as pointed out by FenixR. This flaw is that IC2 upgrades stack to 64, when really they shouldn't stack anywhere near as high. There is no difficulty in choosing which upgrades you are going to use...
Yep. That's a good point. Wait ... you've visited the profile of FenixR ?
You were probably bored -
Not that useful, but it seems fun ^^. At least that would explain why I always suffocate in CF blocks
-
Hi everyone!
I'm here to suggest a few (ok, not really, it would be a huge one ^^) changes on the Storing energy system.
This is described by 1 line:
Making storage more expensive and HAVING LOSSES (and reducing max storage capacity for each storing machine).
I mean, consider a MFSU receiving 1 000 000 EU. Instead of giving you back these 1 000 000 EU, it would give you back 250 000 EU. That would also need Upgrades, that would increase efficiency (from 25% to 35% for example), total storage (and being cheaper for their cost than building another storage device) or even max Input (but not output).What would be the point of it ? At first, making EU-Network more "realist". In the "with more real problems/benefits" meaning. What would be these problems ? A Solar Pannel/Wind Mill wouldn't be as cool as it is now, because you wouldn't be able to store properly your Energy. And that would buff Fuel-based energy, since you can decide to use when you need energy.
Of course, it would probably require a buff of every generator, just to avoid people from complaining ^^.Obviously, I guess it won't be implemented ever in the game. But just think to it, I think it would be more balanced. At least, we can hope GregoriusT would like to implement something like that in Hardcore configs ^^. (in this case, think of LESU as a 100% efficient storage unit, it would makes it really useful, because for now it isn't ^^).
-
1: it can be either
Thinking of that ... it should be source only, as for now it's very easy to exploit: just put lava on the ceiling ... you'll easily get huge amount of EU.
-
-
Your recipies would be too cheap. And roughly speaking, Tier IV tech are denied for now.
-
4 am.
The post was a lie.
-
and what you supposed to vent if there is no heat?
Cooling Coolants cells ?
-
what about my idea?
... your Idea wasn't really one, since it was a quite obvious suggestion ^^. And ... I think this would be very OP. But since I already think GraviSuit is OP ... ^^. (Not the gravichestplate in itself, because it's very expensive with GregTech, but Advanced Lappack is OP to me).
-
Oh crap, didnt notice, it was 5 AM when i replied, was going to sleep. Sorry guys.
Wrong! The forum say 8 hour for me, we've 5 hours delay so ... 8-5=3. Do you feel spotted being lying ? Bad boy ^^. *Crazyguy*. And no, I'm not stalking you ... for now.
-
Also, buckets are enormous.
And very useful, since the Iron which makes Bucket won't heat or smelt if it contains Lava. Or maybe it'll heat, but Steve is just so strong that he can easily bring something at 500 °C.
-
Only thing that might allow players to consider the finite version are additional item rewards. Time efficiency is reduced to nil by overclockers thus becoming an issue of one time material cost; similarly the EU efficiency with easily accessible free EU generators.
Non stackable Upgrade module. Overclocker Upgrade reducing efficiency for EU, but also for output.
