Posts by MatLaPatate
-
-
UP.
Nobody would use it at this cost. -
Or not, because Idea of this types have been denied (New dimesion and natural Iridium ore)
-
It's obvious.
-
I would be for, but some guys (I won't say who) on this forum would say IC is not for automation.
+ 1/2 -
-1 for what you suggest. I thougt to make a thread to allow player creating bigger miner for they have a larger area of mining and dure more time, because I think the miner is a bit useless as it is, because of the time you use to set the miner/pump/energy sources is very long compared too what you could mine during this time (I count the time for dismantling and I think the miner should be longer too work but should give youmore stuff when it's ended)
+ "nuggets" ? And no ore, so no macerator, no *2 ingot ?
-
+1 too for the idea. I agree too with you (exept on reinforced stone, because it would be too expensive just for TNT).
-
yeah, +1 for you too.
(Even for Apple Juice!) -
Yes. But you use TNT. So that's much better than the non Industrial-TNT but, IC² is a way to get awesome recipes for awesome stuff isn't it ?
-
+1.
Like your signature -
"The robot city idea has some merit, and the city would be mostly made from Decoy blocks A.K.A. Blocks that drops nothing when mined."
I think too. Blocks like Construction Foam/glass/stone (it give cobble, but nobody would use it to collect ressources, cobble is ... Okay, what I would have said is obvious
)
-
I think the technology given should give you bonus, and shouldn't be needed to craft something (Mainly for people who haven't Thaumcraft installed)
So, Trade with NPC, okay, but trade them items (so they use trade-o-mat!), not technologies. -
+1 for FenixR. First time I agree with him maybe ?
-
"Last but not least, artificially crafted Gunpowder... nuff said."
I know. But without revealing informations about it, it's a bit expensive for what it give (I'm speaking about using it to mine. What you would get using it in order not to waste your time mining wouldn't be more valuable than what you would have used to make your ITNT [This sentence is a bit sensless, but ...] )
"QuoteDropping 2 of the Ore's dust isn't exactly hard Fenix.
I know its not, but you would be taking away the most useful trait of the macerator.
"Even with what I suggest implemented, it would be cheaper using macerator than ITNT, no ?
Quote
"
I know its not, but you would be taking away the most useful trait of the macerator. "
Okay for using TNT as a destructive way, for example for fun/PvP.
But, for mining ?
Refer to what I already said."Is not like u have all that iTNT... and even if u make an iTNT farm, is a lot of material and a dangerous proceess compared of few EU that macerators need. Macerators will remain the main way to obtain dusts... By the way... i don't like this... i prefer the ore drop... invenctory is more compact in this way... "
Yes, I agree with you, and that's why I suggested this. (I even agree for "i prefer the ore drop... invenctory is more compact in this way... ", but there would be people who don't)
-
All is in the title.
The basic Idea is that the flint is used to craft the macerator, because when run it can turn something into dust. So, considering blast is a mean to run it, I think ITNT should give you dust from ore(it gives already cobble from stone).
And that would be useful in order to make the ITNT a bit more powered, because actually (as the normal one), ITNT isn't really used to mine (because hunting creeper is harder and longer than mining ores). -
I think it was in order not to create an advanced gen maybe ...
-
+1 for the Idea, but it would be (maybe - a bit) useless, no ? So TNT for blocks for the tools used to mine it: Gravel, dirt and sand --> ITNT , stone/marble/basalt --> TNT + cobble (example) etc ...
-
I mine a lot at the beginning. But I stop when having more than 1600 solars pannels for UU-Matter
-
And water Bucket would be usable too, of course (wasting tin for cleaning painter ...)
-