MkII-1 90Eu/T

http://test.vendaria.net/index…CCCCUCCHUHHUHCUCCUCCHCCHC

Lower efficiency, higher output layout.
It can run a full cycle without any component failure, but it ends a cycle and 9132 heat. (Which the tutorial states isn't a Mk-II)

Critique or improvements? ~80 minutes of cooldown time.

Desu,

Here's a layout that can get either 39 or 38 (1 or 2 less than yours) but I'm having a little trouble reaching the other 4 cells. I've tried a couple different rotations on the uranium, but still only pull in 2 of the cells at most.

http://test.vendaria.net/index…HCUCUUCCUCHCCHCCUHCCCHCCC (4 wasted cells)

http://test.vendaria.net/index…HCUCCUCCUCHUCHCCUCHCCHCCC (2 wasted cells)

http://test.vendaria.net/index…CCUCCUCCUHCCHHCCUUCCCHCCH (1 wasted cell) (Use for SUC input maybe?)

Anyways, another point of heat off if we can master this. (I'm not looking for the most efficient layouts, just high output Mk-II's)

a 95 or 100 Mk-2 seems impossible with the amount of heat that gets generated.

Edit:

Here's a 90 Eu/T with 39 heat instead. slightly more efficient. Still a Mk-2, no SUC, no failures. Shorter CD time than the first 2 designs.

http://test.vendaria.net/index…CCUCCUHCUCHCCHCCUUCCCHCCH (Mk-II 1 90Eu/T E1.8 )

I ran the above reactor through a full cycle, the middle coolant cracks on the 10000th tick, but the reactor ends at 8500 heat. So less CD time and 1 replaced coolant.