MkII-1 90Eu/T

Quartaroy · October 13, 2011 at 7:59 AM

http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…HUHCUCCUCCHCCHC

Lower efficiency, higher output layout.
It can run a full cycle without any component failure, but it ends a cycle and 9132 heat. (Which the tutorial states isn't a Mk-II)

Critique or improvements? ~80 minutes of cooldown time.

dezuman · October 13, 2011 at 8:35 AM

One less point of heating
http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…CCHCCUUCCCHCCHC

Vendigroth · October 13, 2011 at 8:37 AM

if it doesn't need to cool down during a cycle its a Mark 2 or 1, but because your's needs a to cool down from the hull heat its a mark 2

also Dezuman improved my design make a pretty good Mark 2 reactor only needs 4 uranium cells provides 60 EU/T with 3 efficiency and you end up with all your components and the hull about about 5100~ Heat

Dezuman's Mark2-1 (SUC):http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…HCHHCCCCCCCHCHC

Vendigroth's Mark2-1 (SUC):http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…CXCHCHHCHCXCCXC

dezuman · October 13, 2011 at 9:03 AM

Umm .... At least mine isn't SUC. It's just Mk-2 B...

-SUC indicates that it consumes single-use coolants DURING THE RUN, fyi

Edit: Did a long run on my edition, nothing melts

Quartaroy · October 13, 2011 at 7:58 PM

Desu,

Here's a layout that can get either 39 or 38 (1 or 2 less than yours) but I'm having a little trouble reaching the other 4 cells. I've tried a couple different rotations on the uranium, but still only pull in 2 of the cells at most.

http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…HCCHCCUHCCCHCCC (4 wasted cells)

http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…HUCHCCUCHCCHCCC (2 wasted cells)

http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…CCHHCCUUCCCHCCH (1 wasted cell) (Use for SUC input maybe?)

Anyways, another point of heat off if we can master this. (I'm not looking for the most efficient layouts, just high output Mk-II's)

a 95 or 100 Mk-2 seems impossible with the amount of heat that gets generated.

Edit:

Here's a 90 Eu/T with 39 heat instead. slightly more efficient. Still a Mk-2, no SUC, no failures. Shorter CD time than the first 2 designs.

http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…HCCHCCUUCCCHCCH (Mk-II 1 90Eu/T E1.8 )

I ran the above reactor through a full cycle, the middle coolant cracks on the 10000th tick, but the reactor ends at 8500 heat. So less CD time and 1 replaced coolant.

Users Viewing This Thread