1. Forum
  2. Wiki
  3. Bugtracker
  4. Blog
  5. Members
    1. Recent Activities
    2. Users Online
    3. Team
    4. Search Members
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Forum
  • Pages
  • More Options
  1. IC² Forum
  2. Forum
  3. IndustrialCraft²
  4. Industrial Engineering
  5. Nuclear Engineering
IC2 Experimental builds (jenkins):
v2.0/2.1/2.2 / 2.3 / 2.5 / 2.6 / 2.7 / 2.8 (For Minecraft 1.6.4/1.7.2/1.7.10 / 1.8.9 / 1.9.4 / 1.10 / 1.11 / 1.12)
IndustrialCraft² recent version: v1.117!

Very small MI-0

  • Two
  • September 4, 2012 at 10:53 AM
  • Two
    Builder
    Reactions Received
    4
    Posts
    255
    • September 4, 2012 at 10:53 AM
    • #1

    While playing around with the reactor planner for a reactor design for small mining installations with the focus on max EU with the least possible amount of components to carry around, I came up with this design

    It runs 40 EU/t at max efficiency infinitely and only takes 2 CC and 3 HD to run. It as well has 11 free slots for whatever else you want to put in there, like more cooling cells or an additional 10 EU/t if you want.

    Love to get some feedback and possible ideas for improvement.

    • Quote
  • baturinsky
    Coal Miner
    Reactions Received
    10
    Posts
    425
    • September 4, 2012 at 1:46 PM
    • #2

    Not bad, actually. And has optional space for two or three (if you move it one cell lower) coolant cells, allowing to connect reactor with redwire and/or pipes for automatic uranium reloading.

    This setup can be used as mobile power source for miners, teleporters, etc.

    • Quote
  • RockRaiderZulu
    (too long, look at sig)
    Reactions Received
    1
    Posts
    193
    • September 4, 2012 at 5:55 PM
    • #3

    I was screwing around to see if I could get 80 EU/t out of you little reactor. I couldn't, so I added chambers and water and got a Mark I-O with 80 EU/t http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…gjvkb9ms0659ukg

    More screwing around gave the already powerful reactor a cheaper, internal cooling system: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…xg5f4kwv3oe41s0

    Not bad, considering the wiki states that there is a mathematical cap of 70 EU/t for Mark I units.

    A Rock Raider trained as an Engineer, among other things.

    • Quote
  • Two
    Builder
    Reactions Received
    4
    Posts
    255
    • September 4, 2012 at 6:14 PM
    • #4

    I think you missed the point of this thread Zulu, it was about "How to build a reactor with least possible components". ;)

    • Quote
  • ShneekeyTheLost
    Always Lost...
    Reactions Received
    3
    Posts
    290
    • September 4, 2012 at 11:38 PM
    • #5

    Not bad. A little tinkering and I came up with this variant. It requires a bit more resources, but requires no water. It is a Mk II-1 reactor, but you can still run a full cycle before you need to let it cool down, so at least it won't melt down on its own.

    Since it requires no water, you can literally build it anywhere.

    • Quote
  • Rick
    Master engineer
    Reactions Received
    3
    Posts
    1,086
    Location
    Netherlands
    • September 5, 2012 at 7:13 PM
    • #6

    It can get even cheaper:
    http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…1501521s1r11r10

    Official list of good reactor designs:
    [OFFICIAL] List of good reactor designs

    • Quote
  • raGan
    Matterialist
    Reactions Received
    1
    Posts
    599
    • September 5, 2012 at 7:56 PM
    • #7
    Quote from Rick

    It can get even cheaper:
    http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…1501521s1r11r10

    Quote

    with the least possible amount of components to carry around

    I say !

    • Quote

Users Viewing This Thread

  • 1 Guest
  1. Privacy Policy
Powered by WoltLab Suite™