1. Forum
  2. Wiki
  3. Bugtracker
  4. Blog
  5. Members
    1. Recent Activities
    2. Users Online
    3. Team
    4. Search Members
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Forum
  • Pages
  • More Options
  1. IC² Forum
  2. Forum
  3. IndustrialCraft²
  4. Industrial Engineering
  5. Nuclear Engineering
IC2 Experimental builds (jenkins):
v2.0/2.1/2.2 / 2.3 / 2.5 / 2.6 / 2.7 / 2.8 (For Minecraft 1.6.4/1.7.2/1.7.10 / 1.8.9 / 1.9.4 / 1.10 / 1.11 / 1.12)
IndustrialCraft² recent version: v1.117!

A couple mini-reactors

  • Gaijin4koma
  • December 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM
  • Gaijin4koma
    Tree Cutter
    Posts
    2
    • December 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM
    • #1

    I built a couple of small reactors. Any feedback? Optimization possible?


    Mark 1 EA, 1 quad, 0 chambers, 80 EU, 4 EF
    You could triple this design in a 6-chamber reactor for a decent 240EU output like so.

    Mark 1 EA, 2 quad, 2 chambers, 160 EU, 4 EF

    Edited 2 times, last by Gaijin4koma (December 30, 2012 at 5:40 PM).

    • Quote
  • paulcdejean
    Tree Cutter
    Posts
    19
    • January 3, 2013 at 3:15 AM
    • #2

    First one isn't good. It's just not a efficient way to use a neutron reflector each cycle.

    The second one is good for its size. I wonder if I can make a more efficient 2 chamber reactor.

    • Quote
  • paulcdejean
    Tree Cutter
    Posts
    19
    • January 3, 2013 at 3:21 AM
    • #3

    A refinement of the second design.

    2 chambers. Same efficiency. Lower cost. Way lower running cost.

    http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/v3/reactorplan…jmubtbjv51s56gw

    • Quote
  • Barumann
    Walking disaster
    Posts
    72
    Location
    Beees!
    • January 5, 2013 at 6:14 PM
    • #4

    first design: do not use reflectors. This might be better

    • Quote
  1. Privacy Policy
Powered by WoltLab Suite™