I'm back to this site with a reactor that I think isn't all that bad:
Posts by Herobrine_Exodus
-
-
Hey, quick question here. What's the blue-colored MSFU? It's a bit hard to look around the GregTech wiki.
-
With the OP's post, the reactor becomes cheaper and safer if you replace the Advanced Heat Vents with Overclocked Heat Vents.
-
Can't tell if trolling, but those reactors are horrendous and should never be put into operation.
Not trolling, but come on. Look at all the EU production!
-
I made a high-EU gregtech reactor:
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…3c7k3k8n10m5e2s3au4h5m2o0
Is it practical?
EDIT: Higher-EU gregtech reactor: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…wscxssqf7i1ouo7gt3nw96k1s
EDIT 2: Lower-EU All-Radioactive Metals reactor: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…oincpsvef59qg0rw1i97ue60w -
I was thinking that the stuff left over when you burn coal in a generator could be used as a fissionable material as well as being purified into better radioactive things.
-
Here, have some decent-efficiency reactors:
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…0jtu8i2tplbhuhkcntxzu7kzk
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…cm0obdf3fjr9qq72kx8l4obgg
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…nu2sy79rzf3k5d2ce8r03knpc
And a few for GregTech:
Thorium: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…ts5mh7e8p3w428xmixdcr6e4g
Plutonium: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…ekbsj1cis9jfqh7r7n5lexnnk
Plutonium-Thorium: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…3xo5xma1y9ixls6vkdwxw83k0 -
How about Polonium, Radium, or Neptunium as materials that you can use for EU in a nuclear reactor? You've added two major ones (Thorium and Plutonium), but it'd be cool to have even more.
-
Interesting.
-
It's a generator except it gets a bonus from coal and charcoal and things based off of those. I already made an image (earlier project) :
. Since Coal and Charcoal emit a total of 4000 EU in a normal generator, in this they generate, say, 16000 EU. I'm unsure on the crafting recipe, however. Maybe something with a furnace?
-
Well, if you consider "severe waste of resources" to be something bad, then yes, maybe
However in terms of running safety, when the reactor planner tells you "Generation time: full cycle" and calls it a "Mark I" in the heat bar up top, you can be sure it won't blow up on you. Provided you don't place components the wrong way. It can happen to anyone. For 100% safety, babysit the reactor during its first cycle.
I consider resource waste as bad only if there's a much better option that sustains the same level of safety.
-
Would anything bad happen with this design?
Design: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…4j05qeocnyo3d147nlqc7wcu8
Or this: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…s2igt7d01bfno4lt75o6tihvk
Or this: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…zk914t9w0suj2jlktri0su800
Or maybe this: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…b86cj037fsgncodyasu4hi2v4
Or this neat one: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…tc1g83tq7753iozh5x2s0yoe8
Another: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…txkxcf8389xu5stkn2a8yzmrk
More:
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…qh1iwnxpvan42l4s5o1c4m3nk
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…sywdb3lqjncti1vjpc14c3z0g
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…02psd1rrnp6v0059q2rus2scg
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…mznoxv2qzj5q2zji19pox1hj4 -
Share your pure-uranium reactors with me. They should be considerably stable (Mark I or Mark II), and only use the parts from IC2, not Gregtech. The chamber number doesn't matter and I will try to make 1 good one per number of chambers. Here's my 1-chamber one: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…ng60tamfbl9dvjqw64b7qvklc
