I don't think bukkit was confirmed; I've merely suggested that it -could- be an issue (thus logically if it's in use we should be told). However yes, aside from direct path from tile to sky interrupted by NOTHING except glass would be the next step to confirm.
We're using the in-built function of MC to determine whether a block "canSeeTheSky". It's the same function used to determine whether a block will have a light level of 15 during day.
Any sort of "generalieable" blocks, f.e. a set of various different CPU-elements with equal attributes (resistance, stepsounds, transparency) can be compressed into a single ID.
Same like my infinite number of crops is just a single block.
Im a human being, telling me that will only make me more curious about how complex it would be/was/is.
Feel free to hop onto the IRC and bug Player until he tells you stories of the enet. I've stopped trying to understand it ~a few months ago. I know how to use it, i know what it does, i don't need to bother with the algorythm :3
Nightvision does modify the games rendering, something IC can't possibly do (without basefile modding).
Currently i tinker with requesting a general "overlay" hook for MCForge, permitting to display additional HUD elements on screen... depending on how the graphic engine works, one could try displaying a transparent bright green layer over the screen with that hook...
You seriously shouldn't assume nightvision is coming anywhen soon, at best.
Both ideas appear useful.
The chest thingy is probably easy to implement, we just add a minor recoding to make a teleporter being redstoned teleport CHESTS on it's top to another teleporter.
> Itemtransfer.
The energy thing could be slightly more complex to control (as you said, it would require some sort of toggle), will have to check our options to edit GUIs to that degree.
Afaik we only have trade-o-mats? Which do exactly what you said, trading 2 itemstacks defined in the specific input only accessible by the original owner of the block?
It's not possible to "color blocks".
It does only work for new blocks being designed to be colorable.
Assuming you meant "coloring CF Wall blocks":
Don't see much of a reason for this. It would require Wallblocks to be recoded into an Enet entity. You as well didn't specify values regarding Loss and capacity, but i assume you want a "lol i paint my house, wire a cable into the wall and every luminator is powered" solution? Not exactly balanced.
Wiring Lumis with normal cables works perfectly well. With the soon-to-come feature of spraying foam onto cables you can even hide them in walls, perfectly.
To measure EU with the reader we ned to add a semi-complex hook to the enet.
You do not want to think about how much work this sort of advanced mechanism would need.
Now, it'S defense value is above Diamond, given ALL minecraft vanilla armors have a defense of 20/25. Nanosuit has full 25/25, Quantumsuit even exceeds that (which means you can reach past 20 armor with only wearing 3 parts of it.)
However, durability of Nanosuit is clearly below Diamond, probably on Iron level. Not sure where exactly it is.
QuantumSuits durability is probably higher then diamond, but you use a load of energy for special effects :3
Uhm... no permission granted.
We got the 1.1 port done and are testing it currently... feel free to play your version for yourself if you cant wait a few days.
For four diamonds, 168 coal and 32 redstone, it should have a bit more.
Infinite armor with defense higher then Diamond (though lower durability). Should probably nerf it, considering the costs you listed.
We already had that suggestion and it's currently in an open thread in this section.
Consider using the search function next time, BEFORE you post.
In that case, it's something blocking their light-detection algorythm.
Is the chunk your miner is on by any way influenced by bukkit plugins? For example some "bought land" stuff? Could probably influence and mess up Solars.
(S)he said the cable has a loss of 0.5 EU/t/block, which doesn't tell us anything about the EP/p/block.
If you're going that route:
0.5 EU/t would mean "1 EU all 2 cables per tick, regardless of the number of packages sent", thus
0.5 EU/t is even LESS loss then 0.5EU/"p" and even more inbalanced.
Agreed to the guy above you, 2 EU loss per block would me wthin the scheme (4x capacity, 2x loss = 2x efficiency).
Don't see a real reason to introduce an even higher voltage level though.
Hmmm.. and the second setup does not produce ANY energy?
Given the batbox is facing correctly (into the miner), i can't tell why it shouldn't work, given it doesn't appear to be raining.
Try removing and replacing the cables OR reloading your world. This can fix a rare-occuring Enet-Bug skipping TEs.
Didn't consider this yet :3 Stuff is not meant to exceed EV, for sure.
Did you actually TRY teleporting?Most likely the second message is client-wise and incorrect/unnecessary.
Thanks for mentioning it, though.
Tell him there are none :3
At least none are meant to be echanted, though it's currently possible for everything armor or tool-like. You can get the IDs yourself by checking the config file.
Loads.
Less loads then the QuantumSuit though.
And probaly not as much as a Diamond armor. However, it's rechargeable and will even provide some slight protection if it'S out of energy. Even more important, it's armor capacity doesn't diminish as it takes damage (100% Suit = Full armor, 80% Suit = Full Armor, etc, 0% = Slight Armor).
