Posts by Elthy

Plasmas do exist for all elements and were automaticaly created. Most dont have a recepie and propably wont ever get one.

How about making Duranium a "diluted" alloy of Neutronium? Something like 1 Neutronium+20 Iron=20 Duranium....

Wow, those assembling line recepies are hard.

Now that we have more End-Game stuff, how about a better version of the processing array? Having 32 or even 64 machines in it would help a lot with all the stuff required to get a decent neutronium production online.

Also what about better transformers, that accept 4 amps and output 16 amps?

Like blue steel, just neutronium based?

What exactly does the change to neutronium mean for turbines? They now produce 4 times the energy at 4 times the plasma usage for 4 times longer time till it breaks, right?

Quote from Blood Asp

No, there are no efficiency issues when using normal water for large boilers. Maybe maintainance issues to be fixed?

It may be caused by messed up things at e.g. server restart. Ill try to nail it down, but thats hard since it allways behaves well when im watching...

Are GT largeboilers slowly using more fuel over the time when run with normal water? My pyrolysis setup was stable for hours, its calculated to the tick, so there shouldnt be a change in fuel level. But after like 10h the alumentum buffer started decreasing...

Now we even got Naquadah in our overworld miner. Something is wrong with that i think...

I dont fully understand how the advanced miner 2 mines its ores. We placed one on level 29, to mine an uranium vein. Strangely there is also bauxite/ilmenite in its output, which have no small ores and only spawn above level 50. How did the miner reach them?

Wow, thats cool! Could you add that to the tooltip?

Sadly no such thing in our modpack (althoug im 100% sure there is a mod for that). I can only change the frequency in +/-32 and +/-1024 steps. Sadly its random which area of the transmitter/reciever changes what when i rightclick it...

Is there any system on how to adjust the requencys of a Redstone Transmitter/Reciever?
Whenever i think i have figuered it out one doesnt behave like the others...

Is there information about the energy needs of the advanced miner 2?

Afaik the hatches are limiting. On MK2 they can only take 4k eu/t per hatch, so you need more energy hatches.

Now that im testing Infitech 2 3.2 with GT5.09 i have some questions:
-How is the duration of a charcoal-pit calculated? Is a bigger one faster (per block) than a small one?
-Whats the most durable material besides Neutronium (in huge plasma turbines)
-Is Neutronium now producable with UUM? It still takes 100 buckets of UUM and i cant realy test sinc it would take a months to scan Neutrium, even in creative.

Is the energy also rounded up in proportion to that?

Suggestion:

A maintainance hatch made from neutronium should lower the need for maintainance on multiblock machines.

I dont see any use in new elements anyway. There are lots in the mod that are useless like Tantalum, also it would require new Worldgen, which would break existing saves.

Oh, we are talking abou 5.09...

7mb/t is much for plasma, my huge naquadah alloy eat about 1mb/tick of sulfur plasma. With even higher energy density its not possible to get the right flowrates.

That brings me to a suggestion: How abuot lowering the density of plasma? Make it produce less energy per bucket, but more plasma is produced in the reactor? That would kinda limit the ability to transport billions of EU in a drum, but with huge stationary tanks that shouldnt be a problem.

No, Iridium is a good option, too. Still not very durable, im switching to single block generators which are superior in all ways other than efficency, but even that gets offset by the strugle to fill plasma turbines with the right amount of plasma.