That's weird.
I have said several times that the Downloadlink in the "public releases"-Thread is WRONG but you said it was fine!!!
That's weird.
I have said several times that the Downloadlink in the "public releases"-Thread is WRONG but you said it was fine!!!
Edit: Ninja'd by I don't now
You needed 11 Minutes more to Post it! You don't even need Ninjaskills for that.
Suggested and forgotten.
At least a good Idea to repeat that.
NEIN!
Es wurde bereits abgelehnt!
I suggested that together with other additions in the "[Suggestion] More uses for Gold, Silver and Bronze"-Thread, but it got ignored, because of too many complaints about Gold and Silver.
Just for this contest, I reworked the crafting table a bit so it works with regulators.
Is it out now?
The tiny human failure is too damn high. If it doesnt runs correctly on both Systems, then you are the Problem. I dont know what it is, but at least now i know from where it comes.
Nein, NBT tags according to alblaka is a magical infinite reusable Eco-friendly coding property that allows an item to be as awesome as they want it to be (Also cause stuff to not stack and other shenanigans).
Enchantments in Electrical tools was deemed either stupid and senseless since technology and magic usually never mix together (Depends on whoever is doing the mixing), or simply because it was too op to be left alive.
I just thought it was removed, because the Enchantment-NBT is not compatible with the IC²-NBT (and of course for removing the Magic).
Forestry + BC + RP + IC + PowerConverters = Energy WIN!
Biogas engine + milk (RP automatizated) + BC conductive\waterproof [for lava] pipes + Power converters Converter + IC wires = 5Eu/t.
Got 256 engines powered by milk generating 1280 EU/t at server.
And thats much cheaper than 2000+ solars right?
Right.
At least this is a good Engineeringsolution for someone, who's not interested in Lag.
Adding to Alblaka's comment - When you take packet size into account, Gold has half the energy loss of copper, HV Iron has half the energy loss of Gold, and EV Iron has
halfa quarter of the energy loss of HV Iron. Just remember to fully insulate your cables (2x for gold, 3x for iron) -- this drastically reduces energy loss.
Just corrected your Facts.
Who says its impossible?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ElfzzrwS_c
I said NOT REALLY POSSIBLE and not IMPOSSIBLE, learn the Diffrence.
I just dont use NONRENEWABLE Stuff in MY machines.
Its away since IC²-Stuff uses NBT-Tags for storing Energy in Tools, Armors and Batteries INSTEAD of enchantments.
I think thats an old and known Bug.
The Serverjar says that because you deleted META-INF. DONT DO THAT.
You do know that insulated copper cable has an energy loss (uninsulated cables lose energy faster)for 4+ block distances, right?
That is not the Problem. The Generator has sometimes really weird output (even for me).
Its "EU" and not "AU"
But i wondered several times, why the Generator doesn't output it's Energy in a normal fashion (since ever not only since 1.95b), if its connected to an Energystorageblock.
So you are basicly doing "Send only Excessenergy to the Massfab and detect that"
so i should not make threads that say not to make threads with out searching first?
He will think: NOT AGAAAAAAAAAAAAIN!!!
Cool argument about nerfing the absolutely worst Generator in IC², it has the lowest efficiency of all (except unmanned Water) and the highest costs of all and still all the Noobs are using it. Whats wrong with you all? Most of us having Redpower (or even BC) installed, and with it, it's too easy to generate more maintenancefree Energy, than a large Solarpanelconstruction, AND STILL its used by you all, and you are still complaining about Solars are too OP!!! Just to remember you: IT'S THE F**KING WORST GENERATOR OF WHOLE IC²!!!
You may heared me the shouting that out.
WTH, thats already suggested (Blockalike paintable CF), and the original was much better than yours. We could need a new Rule to have at least 10 Lines of sensefull Text in a Suggestion ("Hello!"-Lines and "What do you think?"-Lines doesnt count!).
You are arguing against FenixR, because he made an intended Grammarmistake, to show you how much sense your suggestion made, and you are talking about "Red Walls with Cables in it", which are already implemented. Do you really mean, we should take your Suggestion seriously??? Me neither.