1. Forum
  2. Wiki
  3. Bugtracker
  4. Blog
  5. Members
    1. Recent Activities
    2. Users Online
    3. Team
    4. Search Members
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Forum
  • Pages
  • More Options
  1. IC² Forum
  2. Forum
  3. IndustrialCraft²
  4. Industrial Engineering
  5. Nuclear Engineering
IC2 Experimental builds (jenkins):
v2.0/2.1/2.2 / 2.3 / 2.5 / 2.6 / 2.7 / 2.8 (For Minecraft 1.6.4/1.7.2/1.7.10 / 1.8.9 / 1.9.4 / 1.10 / 1.11 / 1.12)
IndustrialCraft² recent version: v1.117!

This is the best?

  • arbee1996
  • December 15, 2013 at 10:22 PM
  • arbee1996
    Tree Cutter
    Posts
    1
    • December 15, 2013 at 10:22 PM
    • #1

    http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/v3/reactorplan…gigg1zl73grp1q8

    • Quote
  • Epic Lulz
    Copper Miner
    Posts
    1,102
    Location
    The land of Hayo
    • December 15, 2013 at 11:49 PM
    • #2
    Quote from arbee1996


    http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.%e2%80%a6gigg1zl73grp1q8


    It is impossible to determine whether a reactor can be considered the "best".

    Plus, this reactor design isn't even original.

    • Quote
  • Omicron
    In Excel We Trust
    Posts
    559
    • December 16, 2013 at 9:21 AM
    • #3
    Quote from Epic Lulz

    Plus, this reactor design isn't even original.

    He probably saw it somewhere and wanted to know if it was good.

    And yes, it is good. It's not outstanding, but it hits all the major checkboxes: self-sufficient stable cooling, efficiency around 4, output around 300 EU/t. That's about what you can expect to get out of good uranium reactors, unless you sacrifice either efficiency or power output to boost the respective other.

    The best reactor is... the one that serves your individual needs the best. If you only need 200 EU/t, then even the best possible 320 EU/t reactor isn't going to be good for you.

    • Quote

Users Viewing This Thread

  • 1 Guest
  1. Privacy Policy
Powered by WoltLab Suite™