MK I-O EE No chamber reactor / Introduction to forum

I guess everything goes as first reactor, as long as it's cheap and not blowing up...

Here: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…8nfay20hbnz0zmasr68zd7qkg

Minus two plates and two uranium ingots, 1.67 effectivity instead of 1, same everything else.

I think that "x of x" in planner is misleading... Because 1 of 1 is not "100%", it is very very low. It should read 1 of 4.4

Less IHD's and less water needed:http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…iuhwyrhsmxsob1nzjrbudk1ts

Even less HD's http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…1epuk8nrd2chmwxoixbolyjb4

Quote from raGan

Even less HD's http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…1epuk8nrd2chmwxoixbolyjb4

Running SUC reactors with one chamber is risky IMHO because you have a low ignition temperature. I'd use at least one extra chamber in those case.
Also, how can you expect someones first reactor to pump 3 water buckets per second to it? That's probably not going to end well.

If you don't mind dropping to 40 EU/t, I have a design I'm quite proud of: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…rgtjvfau5jvi89ugrvhombcqo

Eff. 2 is pretty much the maximum for two nuke cells, and the innards can't really get any cheaper unless you go SUC.

Quote from narc

If you don't mind dropping to 40 EU/t, I have a design I'm quite proud of: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…rgtjvfau5jvi89ugrvhombcqo

Eff. 2 is pretty much the maximum for two nuke cells, and the innards can't really get any cheaper unless you go SUC.

Rick's design is better: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…r94liy4i8m6fl9xfn9xtde3pc

Quote from narc

If you don't mind dropping to 40 EU/t, I have a design I'm quite proud of: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…rgtjvfau5jvi89ugrvhombcqo

Eff. 2 is pretty much the maximum for two nuke cells, and the innards can't really get any cheaper unless you go SUC.

Two nuke cells can't be more effective than 2, but there is one (and very likely, EXACTLY one, except for vertical mirroring) mk-2 with three uranium in 0-chamber. http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…a=1p101010110010101001010

Also, SUC is not only alternative to MK-1/2, as there is redstone.

Quote from bubux

Running SUC reactors with one chamber is risky IMHO because you have a low ignition temperature. I'd use at least one extra chamber in those case.
Also, how can you expect someones first reactor to pump 3 water buckets per second to it? That's probably not going to end well.

Lads gotta learn somehow.

Quote from jppk1

Rick's design is better: http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…r94liy4i8m6fl9xfn9xtde3pc

Oh, that's excellent, reduces the costs by a bit more of everything. Neat! Thanks for the link.

Quote from baturinsky

[...]SUC is not only alternative to MK-1/2, as there is redstone.

True, but I was sticking to the Mk. I setups since that's what we started with. That Mk. II is mighty impressive, though.