Chernobyl-367 reactor

I'm new to this nuclear thing, so, please, tell me if I got something wrong.

http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…58e3xovi6ppmkaznt868uc9xc

It's a deadly cheap, deadly simple and deadly effective, but deadly risky reactor.
With no extra chambers and only two heat dispensers it can be constructed very, very early.
It has 367% of base effectivity, or 82% of maximum theoretically possible.

It can charge one MFE unit (through transformer) before exploding. Then it cools down for about 17 minutes (according to planner). MFE unit is set to emit signal when full, and is connected by redwire back to reactor. So, reactor switches off automatically, and without .
Also, some other precautions are recommended, such as activated redstone going over wood block and then inverted into reactor (for auto-switching off when wood is on fire). Not sure if it will work fast enough, though. And, of cause, wall of reinforced stone between reactor and your other significant belonging is highly recommended.

MFE is not recommended to be directly connected to anything else, but instead should be used to charge things such as lappack once or twice per cool down period.

Quote from Zueskin

I feel as it is appropriatedly named due to its Russian sense of character, having a wood sensor to turn the reactor off in case of melt down IF THE LOG IS BURNING.

Ironically, reason for Chernobyl Distaster being so, well, disastrous, was that graphite moderators DID catch on fire, resulting in a lot of radioactive smoke/fallout.

Wooden sensors idea, though, is not mine - i found it here How to make a reactor safety shutoff
And it is not a necessary part of design, just an extra safety measure.

Two blocks are for redstone wiring.
I'm trying now to set reactor only charging MFE if it is completely empty, and connect it to the main grid. This way, energy will not go to waste when there is less than 330 eu below maximum.

I think it's better to make reactor running in "minicycles", like 10 seconds on/100 seconds off, to keep temperature at minimum.
With one extra chamber and one extra dispenser effective output can be set to 34 EU/t, which is supposedly more than BatBox can digest. So, if we feed output through BatBox without wasting, then reactor never can work hard enough to explode.
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…unp464g1kkpy5yuculxatxx6o

Alternative 1C/3HD loadout with more uranium/effectivity and 32.7 EU/t
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…ph9zfvlxqqm3ak7z48rb4m9ts
Will be probably dangerously hot even after 600k Eu, so better to feed it to BatBox (set to take energy when empty only) directly (through transformers), instead of MFE.

I finally made it work as intended. Problem was, if BatBox is set to emit if empty, it should NOT be adjacent to transformer.
So, it's Reactor-MV transformer-LV Transformer-Copper Wire-BatBox - Wire to main grid
BatBox is set to emit when empty, and restone inverted into reactor.

There is probably some lag and some energy buffered in transformers, so BatBox receives several thousands of EU each time reactor starts up. I have not tested it with fresh elements yet, but it seems to cool over time and behave as Mark i overall.