That will never happen. At least, Antimatter generation, coming from Solar Satellite-power plant. (because it would be "easy" to transport).
Antimatter is a super efficient Battery, since 99% of it gets converted into Harnasable Energy.
I was talking about the Theoretical Mining of large Clusters of Antimatter using electromagnets. We found tiny little Traces of it in space, and its Possible that there are entire planets made of the stuff since the universe is so freaking big.
I was talking about the Theoretical Mining of large Clusters of Antimatter using electromagnets. We found tiny little Traces of it in space, and its Possible that there are entire planets made of the stuff since the universe is so freaking big.
yeah but ... how do you think we would find these planets with our way of travelling space ? I guess the best we could do would be to join another galaxy, using a giant Biosphere-ship. So no way to harvest things so far.7
Btw, Converting Antimatter into energy is quite hard ... especially since gamma rays are unusable to heat something, generate electricity or such ... (they can theoretially, but not in a accurate way, I mean the best way we would have to use these would be to contain some slowly-liberating-antimatter-cell to heat something, making kind of a Heat Battery. (Same as for Nuclear thingies)
yeah but ... how do you think we would find these planets with our way of travelling space ? I guess the best we could do would be to join another galaxy, using a giant Biosphere-ship. So no way to harvest things so far.
Wormholes and Stargates? :3
Wormholes and Stargates? :3
That'd be a bug of the universe. Because that would induce nature-exploits, such as "teleporting" proton at 1*10^-100000 m of another proton, and so creating an insane amount of energy. And, even assuming it could be feasible, tnot to be "exploitable", the universe-laws would have to make that teleportation-like very energy-intensive, depending on the area you wanna go to (otherwhise it would break the conservation principle, which is, at least to me, the fundamental one).
That'd be a bug of the universe. Because that would induce nature-exploits, such as "teleporting" proton at 1*10^-100000 m of another proton, and so creating an insane amount of energy. And, even assuming it could be feasible, tnot to be "exploitable", the universe-laws would have to make that teleportation-like very energy-intensive, depending on the area you wanna go to (otherwhise it would break the conservation principle, which is, at least to me, the fundamental one).
SCREW THAT!!! PORTAL GUN TIAHM
Why don't you keep Stargates? If you find one(Please don't search for my Secret Stargate Storage, its kind if broken in a deadly way.), you can travel trough the universe for only some energy provided with Solar and Wind gens! Nuclear energy is really from yesterday! Even Ferengi dislike it!
Why don't you keep Stargates? If you find one(Please don't search for my Secret Stargate Storage, its kind if broken in a deadly way.), you can travel trough the universe for only some energy provided with Solar and Wind gens! Nuclear energy is really from yesterday! Even Ferengi dislike it!
Solars/ What am i going to do, Encase the sun with them?
FUSION FTW
Solars/ What am i going to do, Encase the sun with them?
FUSION FTW
Solar is a byproduct of Fusion energy.
Solar is a byproduct of Fusion energy.
But its crappy and Inefficient D:
@bove But Solars are possible to build in Real Life, Fusion Reactors sadly aren't.
@bove But Solars are possible to build in Real Life, Fusion Reactors sadly aren't.
But Thorium-based reactors would be enough to keep producing energy for mankind need for ... millions of years.
@bove You know, Thoriums Half-Life is too long. Even longer than we have to wait for Half-Life 3/Half-Life 2 Episode 3. But if there would be a place to put the old Thorium, it would be a good idea.
You know, Thoriums Half-Life is too long.
What does not really count when you have enough Neutrons.
@bove But Solars are possible to build in Real Life, Fusion Reactors sadly aren't.
In about 100 Years it should be.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fusion_experiments
In about 100 Years it should be.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fusion_experiments
Actually... there are plans for Fusion reactors to be operational by 2015-2019... The main problem with them is how to handle the massive ammount of energy and of course, how to start the reaction.
Actually... there are plans for Fusion reactors to be operational by 2015-2019... The main problem with them is how to handle the massive ammount of energy and of course, how to start the reaction.
Does anybody have any statistics for how much energy they would produce? Im sure when they get fully operational ones it would replace nearly all energy.
Does anybody have any statistics for how much energy they would produce? Im sure when they get fully operational ones it would replace nearly all energy.
Well, you can think that Solar energy is just a tiny byproduct of fusion energy...
Its never good to have only one energy source for anything.
Its never good to have only one energy source for anything.
Why? the only thing i can think of is that they suddenly discover that some random product of fusion blows up the planet.
If you have multiple Reactors for places (I didnt mean use ONE, since you would probably need a fair few to power the planet)
@bove Imagine some Terrorists would destroy the 11 Fusion Reactors that Power the whole world.
