This thread is also a month old, much older than FTB 1.1.0 is.
So be careful when you start saying what FTB does or doesn't have... :p
This thread is also a month old, much older than FTB 1.1.0 is.
So be careful when you start saying what FTB does or doesn't have... :p
This thread is also a month old, much older than FTB 1.1.0 is.
So be careful when you start saying what FTB does or doesn't have... :p
And a month ago it was 1.0.2 and was still GT2.90, so I was quite careful thankyouverymuch
But seriously, I'm having issues finding good reactor designs for the new GT. I miss my 367 eu/t, 0-temp, no-maintenance (except pluto/thor cells), 4-chamber stackable reactor
Yeah, the unintended overscaling is quite dead, bugfixed ruthlessly... We now have to make do with the normal values.
On the plus side, both thorium and plutonium got a noticeable buff recently. However the computercube currently simulates it wrong. Already reported the bug earlier.
I made a tentative 4 chamber design a while ago when the 1.5 builds stabilized for the first time. Of course, values changed since then, so I can't guarantee anything. And it is quite severely unbalanced. You could however develop a 4-chamber thorium sink reactor that consumes your leftover thorium while this guy consumes mostly plutonium.
On the plus side, both thorium and plutonium got a noticeable buff recently.
How recently? Do you know which release? Just trying to figure out if it made it into 1.1.0 of FTB Ult or not.
Sometime between 3.04c and 3.05g. Greg's not telling us wen he tweaks this stuff, and I can't test every version, so I usually check one every 2 weeks or so.