Peace out guys
Also, don't fall into "attack the messenger" fallacy (even if the other party is a messenger).
Peace out guys
Also, don't fall into "attack the messenger" fallacy (even if the other party is a messenger).
Yes, false report.
I see what you did there, essentially trading 1 inventory slot for another inventory slot.
Tested on SMP, work as intended. This topic is no longer relevant.
Tested this in SSP, the machine does not react with that.
I will test in SMP, I just need another tester online.
While on the topic of teleporter, i attempt to link two teleporters at relatively close distant. I got teleported 270 blocks away in the middle of nowhere. I got the save file since there is no error report.
In a random occasion, the teleporter blows up . Currently testing on why and how.
Officially, how is it coded to explode?
I believed the fiber cable is designed to be not-shocking the player. I tested this with transfering 0.25 EU/t average from watermill to a batbox.
Just test to scrap scraps, apparently recycle refuse to do it.
For testing, i actually put empty cell on the top , and water cell on the bottom in the trade-o-mat menu. I put some empty cell and water cell in a private chest and in a regular chest next to it. I asked killerbeez to trade, apparently putting the empty cell or water cell in any way by 3rd party cannot perform trade.
Reproduced error.
java.lang.NullPointerException
at ic2.common.TileEntityMatter.onNetworkUpdate(TileEntityMatter.java:225)
at ic2.platform.NetworkManager.updateTileEntityField(NetworkManager.java:21)
at ic2.common.TileEntityMatter.setState(TileEntityMatter.java:192)
at ic2.common.TileEntityMatter.b_(TileEntityMatter.java:75)
at rv.l(World.java:1472)
at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.k(SourceFile:1384)
at net.minecraft.client.Minecraft.run(SourceFile:666) at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
But if we somehow can contact the yogcast people to arrange the timing with IC2 devs, it can be made into win-win situation. (Right now, I will give them the benefit of the doubt).
If the yogcast agreed to the time scheduled, then it can be synchronized with the release of new version of IC2 with the SMP along.
They get the broadcast, IC2 get the publicity at the right timing, Minimal damage achieved.
Oh...I know right. I don't see how some people can have fun playing Vanilla Minecraft Endlessly or just using Inventory Editors. I basically lost interest in MC after Notch stopped Secret Friday Updates. Ever since then, I've been on a Minecraft hiatus for about 3 months. Came back and bam bam, mods everywhere. DOWNLOAD DOWNLOAD!
Anyways, on-topic. I am all for mod promotion as well, but yes...unauthorized modpack usage...is just, well you know.
I can understand the first-time modding by inexperienced player. I was in that position, and I did prefer having someone spoon-feed me almost all the way. Understanding that, I cannot 'condemn' all of the modpack downloaders due to reasonably not simple procedure to do for them. But when you have someone who make the modpack as a simple "F U modders" remark, it is obviously do not present himself in a more favorable way. And the whole fiasco is more to the promotion of the "F U modders" modpack by a reasonably popular broadcaster to the public audience.
Half you guys are idiots.
Yes they are endorsing the pack, HOWEVER, they are giving credit to ALL THE MODS USED in the description, so blame the modpack creator, not the yogscast, THEY'RE CREDITING THE MODS PEOPLE. Take down the pack I don't care, but don't blame the fucking yogscast when they're trying to give credit to all the mod creators, idiots.
Jesus.
So bash the modpack creator, NOT THE YOGSCAST.
The request is simple, take down the mediafire link, and the mentioning of the modpack. Cut off the middleman.
Why Yogscast get partial blame? Let me explain this from my understanding.
We agree that unauthorized modpack is bad, right?
Can we agree that Yogscast's staff understand that modpack is bad? Well, let's branch this off to two possibility.
a. If Yogscast's staff do not understand that modpack is not genuinely OK, it is time for them to learn that it is not OK and fix whatever they can do , which they has yet to do at the time of this post (removing the link and the mentioning of the modpack)
b. If the Yogscast's staff do understand the controversy against the modpack, give me an excuse to why they bother to put the link to the modpack, credit to the compiler of the modpack along the side of the original modders. I am quite sure that even if they use the modpack, no reasonable people can easily figure it out from the video if they get it from the modpack, or they compile the mods themselves.
Now, I will give them the benefit of the doubt for the next 24 hours before I will make up my mind about them.
Also, do not use the term 'idiot' lightly, as only limited number of people in this world has the right to use it, and I am quite sure that I am not one of them
If there is nothing can be done, then let's try to read Eloraam's response which I find as a quite passive yet strong response to the whole thing: http://www.minecraftforum.net/…76__st__6720#entry8707076
By the way, since I know it'll come up again, on the subject of KakerMix's unauthorized modpack, my opinion is this.
Why didn't he even bother asking me?
I do sometimes allow modpacks. I even have a modpack policy. By not bothering to ask me, now I have to be outraged instead of happy about being on Yogscast. Way to build good will and trust.
A lot of the code in Forge is my work. The work for 1.8.1 is 100% mine. I've put a lot of effort into trying to make the various mods work better together. He didn't have to go around my back to do this, at least with RedPower.
And on the money issue, yes, he is "stealing money" from me. It's not a lot of money, but adfly pays for the server I use for my blog, and the dedicated hosting for my files. I don't use mediafire, once you get through adfly, no second level of ads.
The sad part is that, for me, the timing is pretty good. Allowing a complete 1.7.3 collection just before I get my 1.8.1 releases out would bring in a lot of users, and that could be good. I had every reason to say yes, there really was no call for this childish behavior.
Now I'm not going to make a big drama scene out of this. I'm still working on Forge and RedPower. I'll keep working on it. So long as they don't also steal my RP 2.0 prereleases when they come out, I won't even make a big fuss. If my adfly can't support my blog server anymore, I can keep paying for it myself, but at that point, RedPower is costing me money and I'll be more likely to spend my time working on Minia instead. So far, no worry of that happening.
Currently watching the comments being added on the youtube video.
Quite horribly game-breaking. 3 of these will produce about as much as a mk.1 2-chamber nuclear reactor, and guess which is cheaper?
Edit: Really, why make the simplest renewable energy source both 12x as compact AND *much* cheaper?
or just put 9 solars together to produce 8 eu/t.
cvl4317,
Please let me know how you think it breaks the game. Does it cost to little or does it output to much? Oh and I never liked tin cable any way. It was shockingly bad (like my pun) in the first place.
I don't feel it is game breaking as now. But considering the cost to make it, I prefer having it producing at 16 EU/t (or 8 EU/t). Keep it to the power of 2 for simplicity purposes.
Did I just watch the whole videos in one run? yes I just did.
Allow me to give you alternative to this power regulator.
Make a device that simply detect flow on the cable. If there is energy flow, do a redstone signal. This alone will allow more possibility of combination with other existing material like flow control, only with just 1 block of detector, or detector that you can manually adjust trigger range.
Do want this.... game breaking or not, since it is better for everyone to have space-efficient solar production regardless of cost. Obviously no more tin cable.
It is a dirt face disconnect.
java.io.IOException: Received string length longer than maximum allowed (17 > 16
)
at vl.a(SourceFile:191)
at ey.a(SourceFile:33)
at vl.a(SourceFile:145)
at iq.e(SourceFile:190)
at iq.c(SourceFile:10)
at no.run(SourceFile:77)