Posts by Blood Asp

Quote from Arch

I'm working on it... Don't worry. It'll take time though.

Would you like I came into your mods threads and say : "Hey, how about you hurry up ?"

I'd enable Adventure Mode if it'd be heavily nerfed wrong tool usage. Not disabled. Plus it interferes with features of some mods.

No, no, i certainly also did not mean you work to slow...

I just meant exactly what i said. Balancing should be done on the new stuff, not the old.

It is also not that i will riot (like others it seems) if i do not get my will. I just want to explain my ideas so others understand me instead of just saying "i want".

I never called anyone anything and i never said K3 is too easy. I know it is extremely hard and i expect to die a lot.

But instead of disabling old, proven mechanics, how about balancing the newly added stuff a bit more?

Kirara allways had adventure mode. And in the last year i never heard anyone complaining about it. There were no issues. And why do now come so many on the server that is meant to be the hardest? All arguments besides 'do not like' so far had wrong informations like 1.8 adv mode knowledge.

Your hashmaps...

After that i put a counter on them to see how often they are accessed on startup...
Just GT alone does check 5,900,000 times if something is inside an list each startup.

GT is allready as optimized and multithreaded as possible. It is just so much bigger than other mods. In one of the first versions i broke by accident a single optimization and the loding time of GT alone went from 1min to 25min.
And please, please work on your english. I'm still not sure if i really understand what you want.

Will the spawnpoint set into the town now it's done and not somewere in the nowere? Otherwise the 'starting town' is somehow missing it's purpose.

Also, do we have advanture mode? Two days back it was off.

I will then likely join on the weekend. As long everything runs stable the next days.

Pease make issues on github so i do not loose the overview.

At last the Wiki is now slowly filling. Just finished the Fusion wikipage, tomorrow the large turbine. 2-3 days more and it should be all done.

Quote from MauveCloud

found one way to get naquadria from those ingredients, but centrifuging naquadah dust only gives a 10% chance of a tiny pile of naquadria dust, so how can you come up with such an exact cost list?

With such huge numbers the chance should be quite exact. I expect my numbers to be only off by a few ingots.

Quote from MauveCloud

Wait, why are you getting your plutonium from red granite instead of from plutonium ore or depleted uranium rods?

I would likely massfab the Pu. But from ore or IC2 reactor should also be better than red granite.

And before anyone says it is too expensive: Neutronium is the absolute endgame material. For that it is likely even too cheap. Just missing some steps in beween to show that.

I was a bit bored at work, so calculated the cost to produce one neutronium ingot with the fusion reactor assuming no naquadah ore found:
16 Chrome
1344 Thorium
1280 Plutonium
7h36min fusion runtime
44,225,599,488EU

Thats exactly what i would do. Otherwise there would be no reason to use electric freezers.

If you want to make sure i do not forget about it, add a github issue.

GT cables do not follow RL mechanics. For example a 8192V / 1 Amp cable will burn when 32V 2Amp flow through.

That will not help you much if you have to put in the snow by hand from time to time.

Quote from OsmeOxys

Guess this got buried under the reactor talk, but bloodasp:

The energy output is dependend on the turbine put in. I'm still adjusting the balance. Currently it is Optimal Flow L/sec => EU/t in large plasma generator. So maximum production currently possible is 76800EU/t at 120% efficiency or 67200EU/t at 140% efficiency.

How about you have to fill them with ice or snow that melts earlygame and later power them? I don't know how much is possible so i can't promise anything.

Quote from Pyure

For game balance reasons, output should scale with difficulty. MOX isn't just the best output, sadly its also the simplest to put together.

I realize you can't do much about that, its out of your hands. But it sucks that there's no good reason for me to make an actively cooled reactor.

Even if there was just a config option to make passively-cooled reactors output at 10% output (instead of 50%), that would help a lot. Bleh.

If i could: Double fluid reactor output. Or even tripple. It is way underpowered for it's difficulty. Abd then half the mox heatbonus so it is not that powerfull anymore. Also lowering the windmill efficiency allready once they are less then 100 blocks away from each other. So spamming them becomes more difficult.

For now i would say it will take at last some weeks until i change anything reactor related.
I would prefer to be able to rebalance the reactor a bit, but there is no API for that. The mox should allways be better than normal uranium abd the fluid reactor better than eu reactor.
I plan to remove plutonium from default oregen and oreprocessing and readd U235 so a uranium reactor is allways needed to start.

Quote from Arch

It does have an API. Do this and you're my Hero. As well as EU-Freezer. ;P (For hero status. ;P)

The Freezer was a powered storage that keeps food from spoiling, right?

Quote from SpwnX

Changed enviromine, hunger overhaul and spice of life configs.
Things may or may not need further change.

I wonder if enviromine has an API i can use for my modular armor. Build in Camel pack, heating/cooling and fresh air supply build in would be nice.