And here we have the final proof that IC + EE is broken!
Really, looping around SCRAP with a profit is just silly 
Amazing setup though, if I had the time I would probably get EE just to design shit like this 
Posts by dezuman
-
-
Hint: There shall be no open slots
-
But if it wastes coolants it SUCks
-
Lolnope, that design had 4 coolants not connected to a HD
Edit @ tripleX: They are kay, but not good
AFAIK the record for a square setup is 28 heat, and the small one doesn't need that much stuff...
However, it inspired me to design a no-chamber 3-uran-row MK2. Like 50 min CD, but still neat early on! -
To be exact, water blocks provide 1 cooling and reactor chambers 2
-
Well ... You can do that with 4 less chambers. Now go figure out how
-
Hey Rek, yours wasn't perfect either. What's up with this fetish for HDs?
http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX -
Read what he wrote. In your example the uran is surrounded by 4 cooling elements, hence it only ticks for 4 heat (1 for each, hence no net heat)
-
Yeah, the old forcefield drained like 10 eu for 1 more blocks each side while this one need something to the power of two...
-
Just to say it, even with 1eu/block this thing will drain energy like there's no tomorrow if you use it for area protection. For example a 10*10*10 cube contains 488 border blocks!!!
-
Just upgraded from IC1 or what?
To craft a batbox you only need 3 batteries, 5 planks and a single copper cable
BTW Switch cables were removed and MFEs now outputs Medium Voltage (blows machines)
-
Remember that all HDs and coolant cells store as much heat as the reactor hull itself, so you have to divide any heating/cooling by the number of those (+1 for the reactor)
In this case the number is a simple 50, so a single ice block will reduce the reactor heat by 200/50 = 4
-
Yeah, it would be nice to have the nuclear detector so your reactors will NEVER explode no matter what you do!
-
-
Actually, I would recommend this one
http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…HCHHCCCCCCCHCHC
Only 5 less output for more efficiency AND shorter cooldown period between runs (about an hour) -
But horribly inefficient
A square setup (6 chambers) needs only a small cooldown and has TRICE the efficiency!
-
Oh my, as first try that is GOOD
I mean, this is the best I can wrap up:
http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…CCHCCHCCCHCCCHC
Only 2 less heat
Edit: If you really want a free spot
http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…HCHCCXCCCCHCCHC -
As for the one you linked in the OP, I accidentally 10 HDs
http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…CUHCUHCUCHCCCHC
Edit: This one got more output, but lower eff and longer CD
-
With this i was able to make the highest energy output to cooldown time ive seen yet
http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…HCHCCCCCCCHCCHCProblem is the 1 of the coolers is killed before Tick 2000
I bring you:
http://test.vendaria.net/index.php?reac…UCHCCHCCCHCCCHC
70 EU/t, 2.33 eff, 29 heat (touch over an hour CD)Edit: My base array of sort cools as much at that one but IMO is more useful
-
Reactors weren't touched since the initial release+bugfix.
Al, Y U no respond to OP?
