Posts by dezuman

And here we have the final proof that IC + EE is broken!
Really, looping around SCRAP with a profit is just silly

Amazing setup though, if I had the time I would probably get EE just to design shit like this

Hint: There shall be no open slots

But if it wastes coolants it SUCks

Lolnope, that design had 4 coolants not connected to a HD

Edit @ tripleX: They are kay, but not good
AFAIK the record for a square setup is 28 heat, and the small one doesn't need that much stuff...
However, it inspired me to design a no-chamber 3-uran-row MK2. Like 50 min CD, but still neat early on!

To be exact, water blocks provide 1 cooling and reactor chambers 2

Well ... You can do that with 4 less chambers. Now go figure out how

Hey Rek, yours wasn't perfect either. What's up with this fetish for HDs?
http://test.vendaria.net/index…HXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Read what he wrote. In your example the uran is surrounded by 4 cooling elements, hence it only ticks for 4 heat (1 for each, hence no net heat)

Yeah, the old forcefield drained like 10 eu for 1 more blocks each side while this one need something to the power of two...

Just to say it, even with 1eu/block this thing will drain energy like there's no tomorrow if you use it for area protection. For example a 10*10*10 cube contains 488 border blocks!!!

Just upgraded from IC1 or what?

To craft a batbox you only need 3 batteries, 5 planks and a single copper cable

BTW Switch cables were removed and MFEs now outputs Medium Voltage (blows machines)

Remember that all HDs and coolant cells store as much heat as the reactor hull itself, so you have to divide any heating/cooling by the number of those (+1 for the reactor)

In this case the number is a simple 50, so a single ice block will reduce the reactor heat by 200/50 = 4

Yeah, it would be nice to have the nuclear detector so your reactors will NEVER explode no matter what you do!

Too lazy

Actually, I would recommend this one
http://test.vendaria.net/index…CCHCCCCCCCHCHHCCCCCCCHCHC
Only 5 less output for more efficiency AND shorter cooldown period between runs (about an hour)

But horribly inefficient

A square setup (6 chambers) needs only a small cooldown and has TRICE the efficiency!

Oh my, as first try that is GOOD

I mean, this is the best I can wrap up:
http://test.vendaria.net/index…CCCUHCCHCCCCHCCHCCCHCCCHC
Only 2 less heat

Edit: If you really want a free spot
http://test.vendaria.net/index…CCCHUUCHCCHCHCCXCCCCHCCHC

As for the one you linked in the OP, I accidentally 10 HDs

http://test.vendaria.net/index…CCCCHCCHUCCUHCUHCUCHCCCHC

Edit: This one got more output, but lower eff and longer CD

http://test.vendaria.net/index…CCUCHUCHCUUCHCUHCCCHCCCHC

Quote from Sublimn

With this i was able to make the highest energy output to cooldown time ive seen yet
http://test.vendaria.net/index…CCCUUUCHCHHCHCCCCCCCHCCHC

Problem is the 1 of the coolers is killed before Tick 2000

I bring you:
http://test.vendaria.net/index…HCCUHCCCHUUCHCCHCCCHCCCHC
70 EU/t, 2.33 eff, 29 heat (touch over an hour CD)

Edit: My base array of sort cools as much at that one but IMO is more useful

Quote from Alblaka

Reactors weren't touched since the initial release+bugfix.

Al, Y U no respond to OP?