tl;dr suggestions are in white
Single-Use batteries just don't get the love they deserve. They aren't used in any cool recipes, and more, by the time you can make them you already have RE-Batteries unless you have been powering your macerator with redstone! Coal dust should be made by hand, with a hammer on coal. It can still be made in a Macerator, but not in the Extruder since rolling out coal makes no sense. This way, some people might actually use Single-Use batteries before making a generator. By the way, each Single-Use Battery is good for 1200 EU. Redstone dust is good for 800 EU, and a RE-Battery can hold 10000 EU. Crafting Single-Use Batteries is still the same:
= x5, x8 if Hydrated Coal Dust (Pretend the Gold Dust is Redstone Dust and the RE Battery is Single-Use Batteries)
The obvious problem here is that suddenly it is much easier to make Carbon Nanotubes for Rotors or Nanosuits. I propose a reworking of the Nanotube production line, which is a little bit odd to begin with. Here is how you make Nano-stuff right now:
- Macerate Coal/Coal Blocks to get Coal Dust
- Shapelessly craft 4 Coal Dust to get Raw Carbon Fibre
- Shapelessly craft 2 Raw Carbon Fibres to get Raw Carbon Mesh
- Compress Raw Carbon Mesh to get Carbon Plate
- Craft whatever with the Raw Carbon Meshes or Carbon Plates
I advance this replacement production line:
- Compressed Coal Ball + Thermal Centrifuge -> Raw Carbon Fibre; note that each Raw Carbon Fibre now holds 8 Coal (Compressed Coal Ball = 8 Coal Dust + 1 Flint in Compressor)
- Raw Carbon Fibre (x1) + Metal Former (Rolling) -> Raw Carbon Mesh
- Compress Raw Carbon Mesh to get Carbon Plate
The recipes make more sense to me this way. You get the fibre by centrifuging the impurities from coal which you have already compressed a little to make stronger, with a Flint core as the catalyst (this leaves nanotubes, aka. fibre). You roll the fibre up into a mesh, then compress that mesh with over 9000 Gibbl, and get the Carbon Plate.
The unfortunate side effect is that Nanotechnology becomes significantly more expensive, as it now is not possible to make nanotubes from macerated coal by hand. The total cost of one is 8 Coal, 1 Flint and 24853 1/3 EU (29120 EU if you want it automatic, since no compressing Coal to Coal Blocks) :
- 4800 EU to macerate each coal individually, but I assume the player macerates coal blocks. 600 EU + 1 Coal Block in Macerator gives 9 Coal Dust, so 8 Coal Dust therefore costs 533 1/3 EU. Note that you cannot compress coal into coal blocks (why not???), so that must be done by hand/another mod or you will have to use the 4800 EU.
- 600 EU to compress the Coal Ball
- The Centrifuge is tricky. Assuming it is already warm enough, I observe ~48EU/t for about ~22 seconds. This gives approximately 21120 EU for the one required operation. Warming or idling a Centrifuge costs 1 EU/t.
- 2000 EU to roll out a Raw Carbon Mesh
- 600 EU to compress the Carbon Mesh
For comparison, the current Carbon Nanoplate costs 8 coal and 5400 EU or 1133 1/3 EU using Coal Blocks:
- The same 4800 EU or 533 1/3 EU with Coal Blocks.
- 600 EU to compress the Carbon Mesh
I assume when this mechanic was implemented Coal Blocks weren't a thing, so that partially justifies the increase in cost but possibly not enough for the change between 5400 EU and 24853.33 EU, more than a 4.5fold increase in power consumption. Fully automatic processing justifies the increase from 24853.33 EU to 29120 EU in my opinion. For reference, 24853.33 EU is the equivalent of about 31 redstone dust, 20.7 Single-Use Batteries, or 2.4853 RE-Batteries. 5400 EU is equivalent to 6.75 redstone dust, or 0.675 RE-Batteries.
Thoughts?