it require lot of material and energy to make one and yet, it yield less energy than full stack of charcoal.
64 charcoal was like you take 10-15 min to do lumberjack while the Biofuel require lot of process and machine and energy.
both were renewable source too but why Biofuel less effective than Charcoal?
Biofuel seem underpower?
- FreedomFighter
- Closed
-
Its less effective atm (and I think will be fixed) because the burn values of the materials were not actually taken into account.
-
Its less effective atm (and I think will be fixed) because the burn values of the materials were not actually taken into account.
It's this... I don't think Alba anticipated the 'short fall' of Bio Fuel by using the collective burn values straight off of plants...
But ironically, it's a bit more of an honest view of the state of fuels today.. lol
-
It's this... I don't think Alba anticipated the 'short fall' of Bio Fuel by using the collective burn values straight off of plants...
But ironically, it's a bit more of an honest view of the state of fuels today.. lol
XD...
-
Like Lewis Black says: You know we're doomed when we start considering using food for fuel.
-
I've recalculated the burn value stuff and thus a more balanced version of fuel will be in next version.
Per se, converting coal to fuel (after applying ressource and refinement costs) should result in 30% more energy gain.
For plantstuff, it's 15% (balance reason).
