A list of good reactor designs (IC² v1.103 and earlier)

You're welcome.
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…ps01121s1111110
I didn't spend much time on it so it may not be the best one.

Edit: generation 2 - http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…ps01121s1111110

Edit2: generation 0 - http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…ps01121s1111110
Using original Uranium shape. 14 HDs.

Not /entirely/ sure whats going on here I while I was messing around with Mark II 2.5 eff designs. it has excess heat of 4, but for some reason the maker is telling me it has no cooldown and infinate cycles, classing it as a Mark II - 154

http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…4ziboe1o9mmgbb4

Whats going on here?

Small peek: The next IC2 version will allow pipes and tubes to go into reactor chambers. Get that extra chamber to dive into CASUCs which produce 2070 EU/t

Ive been sitting playing with the planner at work finding new and interesting designs. Stumbled across this and wondered if i'd broken the planner or if the stats actually tie up?

http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…ne84szpa50pn4lc

Type: MKV
Active Time: 3 mins 27
Cooldown Time: 21 secs

Eu/t: 230
Average Eu/t: 208.8
Efficiency: 3.29

Quote from chazdude42

Ive been sitting playing with the planner at work finding new and interesting designs. Stumbled across this and wondered if i'd broken the planner or if the stats actually tie up?

http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…ne84szpa50pn4lc

Type: MKV
Active Time: 3 mins 27
Cooldown Time: 21 secs

Eu/t: 230
Average Eu/t: 208.8
Efficiency: 3.29

Cooldown stays at 21 sec even when you drop active time to 1 second. Hmmm.

Quote from Rick

My nuclear reactors:
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.%e2%80%a61501521s1r11r10 Your starting reactor (Now even cheaper!!!)

Hey, I've noticed that the when the planning tool changed (about 2 days ago), this reactor went from being a 'Mark I-O' to being a 'Mark II-8'. Was the tool incorrect before?

Now that it is a II-8, I've found a way to bring it back to a I-O for just a small cost:
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…cw5rkh3pqma4001

I'm just wondering why the formula used by the planning tool changed. Who maintains the tool?

This way it's cheaper - http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…mv1makwlozc4r9d
Edit: Now I see only 24 water blocks there. *facepalm*

Quote from RichardG

Small peek: The next IC2 version will allow pipes and tubes to go into reactor chambers. Get that extra chamber to dive into CASUCs which produce 2070 EU/t

WOOOOOT! i wil LOOOOOOOVE this

While adding to the resources needed display I realised the planner was counting advanced alloys twice, I fixed it. Sorry for the inconvienience.

I've re-ran the calculations a few times and hopfully they're right this time.

Quote from Talonius

While adding to the resources needed display I realised the planner was counting advanced alloys twice, I fixed it. Sorry for the inconvienience.

I've re-ran the calculations a few times and hopfully they're right this time.

never realy got my atention, i just made the reactor and 20 components each. thanx for the bug "squish"

Hello, folks.

I'm not very good engineer (and my english is devilish bad), but...

My first reactor (not perfect, but i like this design):

http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…jn4n0ew50o8sq4g

My first breeder. Positive, dangerous, effective:

http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…dukdbq6swfbx4cg

Quote from Chezzik

Hey, I've noticed that the when the planning tool changed (about 2 days ago), this reactor went from being a 'Mark I-O' to being a 'Mark II-8'. Was the tool incorrect before?

Now that it is a II-8, I've found a way to bring it back to a I-O for just a small cost:
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…cw5rkh3pqma4001

I'm just wondering why the formula used by the planning tool changed. Who maintains the tool?

There have been a few bugfixes over the last week or so. I know I managed to create a reactor with 4 excess heat which was coming out as infinate. There was a *squish* post stright after. Just check the last few pages for examples.

edit: wrong link

http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/reactorplanner…ajqhdh4ur2b9af4

Just playing with the planner i think i found another bug xD

If its not a bug, 140.6 EU/t average has to be good right?