1. Forum
  2. Wiki
  3. Bugtracker
  4. Blog
  5. Members
    1. Recent Activities
    2. Users Online
    3. Team
    4. Search Members
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Forum
  • Pages
  • More Options
  1. IC² Forum
  2. Forum
  3. Archive
  4. IndustrialCraft²
IC2 Experimental builds (jenkins):
v2.0/2.1/2.2 / 2.3 / 2.5 / 2.6 / 2.7 / 2.8 (For Minecraft 1.6.4/1.7.2/1.7.10 / 1.8.9 / 1.9.4 / 1.10 / 1.11 / 1.12)
IndustrialCraft² recent version: v1.117!

Generators

  • the_dolphin
  • May 16, 2012 at 10:18 AM
  • Closed
1st Official Post
  • the_dolphin
    Tree Cutter
    Posts
    3
    • May 16, 2012 at 10:18 AM
    • #1

    I've got the idear that you could produce energy with fusion-reactors(hydrogyn-cells) and anihilators(blocks and items in general, nothing left[E=mc^2]

    • Quote
  • GregoriusT
    inactive IC² and GT Dev
    Reactions Received
    184
    Posts
    6,253
    Location
    not here anymore
    • May 16, 2012 at 10:37 AM
    • Official Post
    • #2

    Nuclear Fusion is DENIED, look for the Rocketscience-Addon.

    • Next Official Post
    • Quote
  • SpwnX
    Now busy with GTNH
    Reactions Received
    9
    Posts
    5,044
    Location
    Somewhere on Brazil
    • May 16, 2012 at 6:05 PM
    • Official Post
    • #3

    And people with less than 20 posts shouldn't be able to create new topics, otherwise some already denied suggestions and other non-sense may appear.

    rVhj4Q

    We need people to document GregTech, help us by joining the FTB wiki team: http://ftb.gamepedia.com/GregTech_6

    • Previous Official Post
    • Next Official Post
    • Quote
  • MatLaPatate
    Uranium Miner
    Reactions Received
    5
    Posts
    1,903
    Location
    Carrières sur Seine, France.
    • May 16, 2012 at 6:09 PM
    • #4

    +1 For Spwnx. There's too many people going on the forum in order to show us an already existing (and denied) Idea. (I think I make my first thread with 4 post but ... ^^)


    Soon with Molten Salt Reactors, right ? :D
    NERF THA FUSION REACTOR!

    • Quote
  • GregoriusT
    inactive IC² and GT Dev
    Reactions Received
    184
    Posts
    6,253
    Location
    not here anymore
    • May 16, 2012 at 8:30 PM
    • Official Post
    • #5
    Quote from MatLaPatate

    +1 For Spwnx. There's too many people going on the forum in order to show us an already existing (and denied) Idea. (I think I make my first thread with 4 post but ... ^^)

    *Bitch Please*

    +1 for Feanturi, who tried it the first time (but the Forum failed at it so he had to remove it).

    • Previous Official Post
    • Next Official Post
    • Quote
  • passinglurker
    self proclaimed nerf killer
    Posts
    1,401
    Location
    summoning alblaka to destroy the spambots
    • May 16, 2012 at 8:40 PM
    • #6

    which thread is dumber? 6

    1. RE-AD ENCHARTMENT PLZ (http://forum.industrial-craft.net/index.php?page=Thread&threadID=6289) (5) 83%
    2. AD OP GENZ PLZ (this thread) (1) 17%
    Quote from the_dolphin

    I've got the idear that you could produce energy with fusion-reactors(hydrogyn-cells) and anihilators(blocks and items in general, nothing left[E=mc^2]

    remember how i said the "enchartment(derp)" thread was the dumbest thing posted since the last rush of "Y U NO UPDATE" posters? yeah it has competition so cast your votes! which is dumber?

    true balance is impossible in video games the best one can hope for is to make it really hard to guess which of 2 choices are better.
    and remember kids "NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE POWER OF JOKES!"

    • Quote
  • GregoriusT
    inactive IC² and GT Dev
    Reactions Received
    184
    Posts
    6,253
    Location
    not here anymore
    • May 16, 2012 at 8:41 PM
    • Official Post
    • #7
    Quote from passinglurker

    which is dumber?

    The one with the Flipchart.

    • Previous Official Post
    • Quote

Users Viewing This Thread

  • 1 Guest
  1. Privacy Policy
Powered by WoltLab Suite™