Posts by GregoriusT

Quote from raGan

Reflectors are for pussies. http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/v3/reactorplan…72abrxl6orwlaf4

If you don't look at what I wrote above, you can look at this. http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/v3/reactorplan…a9fdm4lnw740cn4
It's cheap and efficient double plutonium reactor, that can be automatically refueled very easily and prefers company of at least 9 exactly the same reactors. (Yes I see thread name and no I did not go through all posts and yes I hope it is not noobish design)

Ahh, nice to see you again. The Plutonium Reactor is a really good one. However, no normal person is crazy enough to spam Nuclear Fuels like that first Reactor.

I would recommend to change your OreDict-Entries for dirty Dusts to "dustDirty" instead of "dirtyDust", because they are still dusts, and dust should have the priority prefix.

Quote from MatLaPatate

Should I post a screenshot showing how much EU produce a tower built by ... someone, for not even 50 Hydrogen generators ?

You mean the Picture I uploaded on the second Post of this Page? That Someone is SpwnX...

Quote from TomTheBeast

Are you partially retarded?
(Not meaning to be a dick, but really?)

Wow, calling RawCode like that this soon, is a new Record (Its very hard to understand him, and he always misses most of the important Information). I will add a few more informative Steps to that:

3) Install IC²-API into MCP
4) call "ic2.api.Items.getItem("bronzeBlock").copy()" to retrieve the Bronze Block of IC² as ItemStack.
5) Do whatever you want with that Block.

Quote from SpwnX

@above : 1:1 (1J = 1 EU, 1kJ = 1000 EU, pretty op in my opinion)

Oh really, I know exactly what you did...

50EU = 1J is the general conversion Ration of UE. And are your Hydrogen Generators really supposed to break the laws of physics (generating more Energy than you got via Electrolyzing)

Oh, and according to SpwnX Steel Blocks are not interchangeable via OreDict inside your Recipes.

Quote from cublikefoot

He found some in his single player, but it was in the overworld, so I will attempt to find some in the overworld. I don't understand why it wouldn't spawn in a Mystcraft age like every other ore.

Thats maybe because he goes via Dimension ID instead of via Biome to determine the generated Ores.

Quote from cublikefoot

I recently added Mekanism to my server, but have yet to find any platinum ore in a Mystcraft age after a good 30 minute search. No player has found any yet, what's the problem here?

It could be the Fact that you are using Mystcraft to search it. Also after your Post, Randomlegends found that Ore somewhere (as you know ofcourse).

I have one small Problem with this Mod. It uses Platinum. In giant and unrealistic amounts (I guess the Ore is similar abundant, but I didn't explore ungenerated Chunks). Your Tier-1 Circuitry uses Platinum as Component, what is really not good in comparsion to the other Tier-1 UE-Circuitry (which just uses a few Cables), that Circuit you make from Platinum is really Elite-Level (Elite = Tier-5), so it should also be that Level. You could add other cheaper Circuits to fix that Problem (for the simpler Machines), while keeping the current ones for higher Tier Machines. In your Case I would switch to a more abundant Material (Gold, Silver, Lead, Electrum), to make the Tier 1 Stuff (and your special Ingots), and generate less Platinum, so you have to use it for Hightech Stuff.

Long Story short: Too much Platinum inside this Mod.

Edit: Bug Report:
Your Energy Cube is saving its data at the Location you placed it. If you break one empty Cube, and place a Full one at the same location, it will just keep the 0 MJ instead of the 5 MJ of the placed Item.

Quote from RawCode

every Item registered as iElectrolizable shoud implement iElectrolizable interface, pretty obvious.
entire implementation of methods shoud be included inside item specific class.

this already done for reactor components.

Again, what do you do if the Item is not accessible (IC² or part of vanilla)? I dont want to have to make a special electrolyzable Item for every single Case, and if I have MetaValue based Items, then this Interface would be complete fail at all the non-Electrolyzable Items.

Quote from MatLaPatate

At least it get nerfed (so many exploits before ^^). But if you're playing with GregTech, there are still exploit available (more like UNequivalent Exchange ^^. Unless it's to get Iridium :/)

Ahem, my Centrifuge could do that too. This would just be a more complex Way of doing that.

Since this got added to the Server I play on, today (yes, that was Monday in my Timezone! XD), and as I also plan to use ICBM, I can test this Mod even in SMP. If I find something wrong, then I will send either a PM or add a Post to this Thread.

Quote from SSD

The opening post has a 112 EU/t thorium design in it which I improved.

Accepted. Good Design as always. Sadly as soon as 1.5 happens, all Thorium/Plutonium Reactors will be obsolete, as I will switch to another System regarding produced EU (to remove the hack into the IC²-Config). Also I will then nerf Thorium by 50%, and make it less useful for Breeders (as that change reduces Pulse Count). Plutonium however, will be twice as good for Breeders after that change.

Quote from Alblaka

I can't remember saying such a thing, mind quoting me?

I guess a Quote with that Content is older than the Reactor Update itself, meaning that even if (I dont know that exactly) Alblaka said it, its from absolutely no Value, as he updated the Reactor System after that.

Quote from RawCode

different item id's is obsolete since NBT implementation.
it shoud register:

itemstack usable
method ontick
method oncomplete

Method registration will allow to do anything, not only templates predefined inside API.

Then every Item has to implement that Interface, and what is if the Item is of another Mod or Vanilla-MC? And you should really work on your understandability. I almost didnt get what you wanted to say.

The Massfabricator has that Problem also in vanilla-IC² without Bukkit. It always rotates downwards after reloading the Chunk. I already reported that to the Bugtracker.

Quote from F4113nb34st

the point of using an int instead of a boolean is for conciseness

The reverse Recipe has another EU-Cost than the original one, so you need to seperatly add the reverse Edition anyways.

Quote from wargames

Could have just been civil like CovertJags and railcraft and asked them to not include it insted of hurting players.

Just, to clear that up: I will remove that Code as soon as they ask me to include it. This is to prevent their commonly known "add Mod and ask much later"-policy. And to test, if they are really not putting that tiny bit of effort to ask before, instead of using a hackish way of including it into their Pack (I'm talking about the creators, not the Users, the Users can hack whatever the fuck they want).

Lets hope the Author fixes the Link, before RichardG comes along here.

But, nice Tools/Armors. Overpowerded but cool.

If we are at it. Please also the same for Electrolyzer Target Storageblocks, like the isTeleporterCompatible, but for the Electrolyzer.

And here its with a few better Parameters:

addElectrolyzerRecipe(ItemStack aInput, ItemStack aOutput, int aEnergyCost, boolean aReversedSlots)

aReversedSlots just says, that it goes form the Outputside to the Inputside, as your Direction is not really needed if you can simply add another Recipe for doing the same thing.

Quote from T10a

What is this 'life insurance' you speak of?

It's called Bed.

Quote from Sebra

I do not think you mine in long range mode without proper aiming. And scatter-shot for mining is too dumb. Just add small cooling time against "mindless shooting".

Go underground, dig out a 2 High Tunnel, aim straight upwards, fire while stepping forward every second shot, Mininglaser Quarry.