Without a screenshot is hard to say;
I remember to have seen this behavior only once before, when I forgot to put a muffler hatch. Maybe yours got obstructed?.
I'm using a Large Bronze one on 5.08.27, and it works fine...------
Speaking about the muffler, Blood, will pollution ever be a thing on the 5U?
Probably. If I can talk him into letting me do it, it will happen soon :p
Well, just don't be too hard on requirements to filter/clean it.
I don't want to use a hazmat suit on my home 
The current designs don't call for any means to clean it. You can create pollution, you can mitigate it (by using better tech) and you can let it dissipate on its own over time.
I agree that cleansing apparatus would be "neat" but it would defeat the purpose.
my apologize... I blocked muffle (I forget It)...
Oh, I need help with Fusion reactor... a complet tutorial :)...
If isn't a problem, could you tell what's the current design?
Can I at least, put it in a giant barrel and dump it in a river (I'll make sure to not put my name on it)?
my apologize... I blocked muffle (I forget It)...
Oh, I need help with Fusion reactor... a complet tutorial :)...
Np, Large boilers, large apologies;
I would like a Fusion tutorial too...
I mean, Wiki says how to assemble it and fuels values, etc, but I have some doubts on how it works:
1- What would be the first recommend fuel (deuterium + tritium)?
2- It says to starts, it needs 40m EU. The 4096eu/t in 16t listed, it's produced, or needed to keep running?
3- I assume that is consumed, but then, it consumes more than produce?
It is intended to run alongside with a plasma generator?
4- It can consume the produced energy internally, or I have to output and input externally?
5 - And the 40m means that I need more than 156.250l of deuterium and tritium to have a positive amount of Eu generated?
Sorry the amount of questions, I not on my PC to test everything, also would be quicker if someone who understand explains it...
Display MoreNp, Large boilers, large apologies;
I would like a Fusion tutorial too...
I mean, Wiki says how to assemble it and fuels values, etc, but I have some doubts on how it works:1- What would be the first recommend fuel (deuterium + tritium)?
2- It says to starts, it needs 40m EU. The 4096eu/t in 16t listed, it's produced, or needed to keep running?
3- I assume that is consumed, but then, it consumes more than produce?
It is intended to run alongside with a plasma generator?
4- It can consume the produced energy internally, or I have to output and input externally?
5 - And the 40m means that I need more than 156.250l of deuterium and tritium to have a positive amount of Eu generated?Sorry the amount of questions, I not on my PC to test everything, also would be quicker if someone who understand explains it...
I'll attempt an answer. Hopefully if I make any mistakes I'll be corrected.
1- D+T is the first reaction that should be done to use helium plasma as an energy source. D+H3 can be done as well but the processing path to H3 isn't as straight forward.
2- 40M EU is the amount that needs to be stored in order to start the reaction. It doesn't get instantly consumed. You need to supply 4096 EU/t constantly while the reaction is going on so if you store exactly 40M EU in the reactor and don't supply it at least 4096 EU/t you won't be having fusion reactions at steady state.
3- It produces much more than it consumes because as you can see it consumes 4kEU/t and only gives you plasma. However plasma gets converted into EU in plasma generators and large plasma turbines. The max EU/t out of the reaction is listed on the right side of the wiki (32kEU/t for D+T).
4- No EU is produced by the reactor ever. You need to convert it into EU externally and feed it back in. Starting up a fusion reactor for the first time is a fun little challenge and can take many attempts if you don't plan and test carefully
5- I'm not sure how you're doing your calculation but that number seems reasonable. It may take quite some time to have a net energy gain considering you need a massive amount of EU generation before you can make a fusion reactor.
Note: the majority of the energy requirements (and logistics and planning) are in the fuel production of fusion reactors. The processing array multiblock makes the laying out aspect a little easier. As for the logistics and numbers: I haven't done them since GT4 but expect to need in the realm of dozens of electrolyzers and centrifuges. Also use LV machines since anything higher results in a loss in efficiency so great that it may be impossible to have a net energy gain.
If isn't a problem, could you tell what's the current design?
Can I at least, put it in a giant barrel and dump it in a river (I'll make sure to not put my name on it)?
Don't have "one" design yet. Blood's God, I just fix stuff. Its up to him 
My personal interests are using pollution as a soft-control to mitigate spammable early tech and early energy. For instance, its common for people to totally ignore nuclear power, or refined fuels, because good old tree farms and lava-gen are amazing in just about every pack ever.
One way to handle this is make these problem-machines cause pollution in such a way that having "some" charcoal power is perfectly fine, but having a ton of it causes problems. As an example: if you want to create the equivalent of 128 eu/t from lava production, that might not be a problem. But if you decided to create 4000 eu/t with high pressure lava boilers, they'll cause so much pollution that they'll clog up your machines, causing them to run at poor efficiency (among other problems). You *could* still do it, but you'd feel an incentive to improve your tech.
Blood's additional interest is mainly things like visual environmental effects, destruction of flora/fauna, etc.
(...)
3- It produces much more than it consumes because as you can see it consumes 4kEU/t and only gives you plasma. However plasma gets converted into EU in plasma generators and large plasma turbines. The max EU/t out of the reaction is listed on the right side of the wiki (32kEU/t for D+T).
4- No EU is produced by the reactor ever. You need to convert it into EU externally and feed it back in. Starting up a fusion reactor for the first time is a fun little challenge and can take many attempts if you don't plan and test carefully
5- I'm not sure how you're doing your calculation but that number seems reasonable. It may take quite some time to have a net energy gain considering you need a massive amount of EU generation before you can make a fusion reactor.
3- Right, I read 32k EU, didn't see the "t", thought it was per process.
It really worths in that case...
4- Oh nice, seems much more fun that way...
5- Wiki, but I didn't calculate the output per tick, so it is probably wrong;
Thank you for clarification, can't wait to make one!
Seems that I will have to kill a few Withers and the End Dragon first.
Weird thing is, In all those years I have minecraft, I never fought them...
An idea is to add a biome like taint of TC.
Said biome would retract itself if the pollution is not high enough (aka either too far from source or simply not enough pollution to keep up).
Lets say a pollution emission of "5" would be able to "keep" a spherical radius of 5 around the base polluted. This biome would imply on damage to plants, health of entities or anything of the sort.
Could have different biomes to state level of pollution too.
Else, you could rely on an invisible chunk map to map pollution, on a similar fashion on how bloody plans to do it for oil?
Well, trees should help to lower the pollution.
Maybe too much could darken the sky, similar like when is raining but you are on a desert. Then add a debuff to running speed (because of the air), and could cause damaging acid rain, depending on how heavy it is.
If pollution is implemented for a "reason", then implementing workarounds that defeat that reason will defeat the purpose of having it. So I personally wouldn't suggest implementing "reduce pollution by X by having Y amount of some block/tree/machine/whatever"
I 100% agree that trees should reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the air, but let's assume that the pollutants are nastier than that.
Tweaking the Sky color is something I'd love to do. Impacting the player with negative affects is certainly plausible.
SpwnX: Tying the pollution to chunks is likely what I'd do. Its simpler and I can ensure it has no performance implications. If Blood does it, he has ideas with tile entities he'd like to try out and which I won't try explaining cuz its his business
If pollution is implemented for a "reason", then implementing workarounds that defeat that reason will defeat the purpose of having it. So I personally wouldn't suggest implementing "reduce pollution by X by having Y amount of some block/tree/machine/whatever"
I 100% agree that trees should reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the air, but let's assume that the pollutants are nastier than that.
Tweaking the Sky color is something I'd love to do. Impacting the player with negative affects is certainly plausible.
SpwnX: Tying the pollution to chunks is likely what I'd do. Its simpler and I can ensure it has no performance implications. If Blood does it, he has ideas with tile entities he'd like to try out and which I won't try explaining cuz its his business
You (and everyone else) are free to start programming on what you want as long i'm not allready working on it.
I will also accept every feature as pull request as long it does not conflict with stuff i do or it is badly programmed. Should i not like it, a default disabled config for it is enough for me to accept it directly into GT5U(e).
The main difference in concept of pyures and mine ideas is that he would save pullution in each chunk seperatly and lets in spread out to the next chunks. (About the same factorio does i think)
My idea was to save a single central pullution per base, covering a radius of 100-200 blocks. Every newly created pullution inside this would be absorbed into it, and they center were the main pullution output is.
Both concepts have it's good and bad points. The main issue i see is chunkloading. On servers when the player is offline, in most cases only 3x3 chunks are loaded, so spreading like in factorio were everything is loaded is not possible.
Is it cool if I ask modding related questions while getting up to speed here? I'll try to keep it to a minimum.
I'm trying to add a basicmachine gui recipe texture based off of Default called Default2 for the fusion reactor since it has two fluid inputs. I can get it to work if I just replace default but if I try to add Default2 to the basicmachine directory and change line 77 to reference Default2 the NEI recipe just shows the empty texture. Is there something that has to be done to add a texture? I figured they would just get taken from the directory automatically.
Nvm got it working. I had to refresh the directory in eclipse manually...
Also I'm trying to find where the rectangle that's in the upper right of fusion reactor gui is declared but I can't seem to find it (or any other "recipes" button for that matter in the code.
Found it at gregtech.api.gui.GT_Container_MultiMachine
Oh well... I haven't see gamepedia was updated with gt5u... and a complete tutorial is here...
http://ftb.gamepedia.com/Fusion_Control…5_Unofficial%29
(again a time, I should have shut my mouth [or break my finger] 
)
So, I'll try following it... and I give u a feedback (or not)...
Did you disable the rock crusher from railcraft being able to process GT materials? if so where can i enable that.
My personal interests are using pollution as a soft-control to mitigate spamable early tech and early energy. For instance, its common for people to totally ignore nuclear power, or refined fuels, because good old tree farms and lava-gen are amazing in just about every pack ever.
Well, I forgot to mention, but yes, tree farms are really OP.
I wanted to change my EU production on my game, but there's not a really good alternative.
I remember that, on GT4 (I think), I used a mix of IC² generators, the Geothermals, one semifluid and a Nuclear Reactor.
Now, with Ic2 generators disabled by Gregtech, we are much more limited.
We don't have a Biofuel production, without oil (for now), the gas and diesel generators are useless. Lava needs a lot titanium for the heat exchanger, or the slow lava boiler, I guess (back to steam). I have no access to a Nuclear reactor, because it uses a disabled IC2 generator (Can we have a gregtech one?)
To sum it up: It would be great to have more early viable options, like a Gregtech biofuel produtcion around the lv/mv age, and a recipe to the nuclear reactor.
So I've found the pertinent lines for adding the NEI button to the fusion reactor but I'm not certain what's the best way about adding it. Since the fusion reactor is a multiblock and not a basic machine the constructor does not have an NEI name. Should I add the NEI name to the multiblock constructor (and then by extension change every multiblock to have the NEI string) or make the fusion reactor a special case? It would be neat to have the button in the upper right of every multiblock to have the NEI recipes but idk if that slot had some alternative purpose. I also want to verify that this sort of change is the right thing to do and falls in line with what you want before I go through the effort of adding it.
Also mods are like onions. It's really hard to keep all of this shit in my head at one time.
Well, I forgot to mention, but yes, tree farms are really OP.
I wanted to change my EU production on my game, but there's not a really good alternative.
I remember that, on GT4 (I think), I used a mix of IC² generators, the Geothermals, one semifluid and a Nuclear Reactor.Now, with Ic2 generators disabled by Gregtech, we are much more limited.
We don't have a Biofuel production, without oil (for now), the gas and diesel generators are useless. Lava needs a lot titanium for the heat exchanger, or the slow lava boiler, I guess (back to steam). I have no access to a Nuclear reactor, because it uses a disabled IC2 generator (Can we have a gregtech one?)
To sum it up: It would be great to have more early viable options, like a Gregtech biofuel produtcion around the lv/mv age, and a recipe to the nuclear reactor.
What's overpowered about tree farms? I dislike MFR because of how unbalanced it is so I don't use it but the tree farm I use right now is run off of opencomputers robots. There's simply no way to run an EBF without automated energy and there's no automated energy outside of tree farms and lava. The notion of tree farms and lava being overpowered annoys me because that's like saying "if you aren't constantly energy starved the game is broken". If you can't do automated energy then you're pretty much just sitting on your hands most of the time waiting for things to get done. That or manually cutting trees, hunting for coal, or hunting for oil. No thanks. I'd rather play smart than play hard.
