[Suggestion] A new transformer and maybe new wire

I have been building a power plant and distribution network for SMP.
And as you might understand there is a loot of energyflow through those wires. I am currenctly using EV and, it is still quite allot energy loss.
I suggest we get a get a new level, UH! (which is Ultra high). Which converts 2048 EU to 8192 and vice versa.
Then we might need a new wire. This wire will have an insane loss if we use 512 EU packets, but if we use 8192 packets we have for example 5 eu/t loss every 10 block.
The wire/cable will be very cheap, but the transformator will be expensive!
Recipies:
Cable(Tin=iron):



=16 UH cable

Transformer:



=1 UH Tranformer

This would be very helpfull for SMP servers, and maybe it should be an addon since this is something that only a few of us need. If this idea is something someone wan't to code, I can try to balance this more.
What you think? It would be very usefull! Have a nice day!

Quote from Marc010

1.The recipe is already used by the HV Cable

2. A HV Cable has a loss of 1EU/t per block
Your cable has a loss of 0.5 EU/t
It should have a loss of 2-4 EU/t

3. EV is already good enough

1. No, the HV cable uses refined iron

2. It was just an example

3. Nah, depends on what you are powering, distanced for example

Quote

Hmm... could really be useful for servers. I would guess that compressing smaller packets into one large would reduce lag. So this is also a reason for server's to use it (or I'm wrong with that guess).

But the cable should change, use Alloy and Redstone maybe, for something futuristic, tin is a to realistic approache for such a cable.

Yep, that's what I first though.
And yes, that is true. The lag is also reduced if everyone uses a powerplant instead of solar flowers on every house.

I wrote that tin is iron. FOr realistic purpuse it should be aluminium, but since we don't have that I chose iron, but a change might be good. What do you think wheen you write alloy? Advanced alloy?

I think I should rise the white flag... Hehe

Yes, after a little more thinking you are right, all of you.

Since so few people need this it's no reason to take more blockID and coding time. This should have been a addon suggestion instead.
Next time I think more before I post, hehe
Thanks for replies everyone!