Rick has stated, twice, that he will no longer be maintaining the reactor design sticky, and that somebody else needs to take over.
There' has been zero discussion on this in the thread, I don't believe many people saw his posts. I am willing to take over, but I will understand if others feel that someone else should, in which case we need a different volunteer.
When was the last time the list *needed* to be updated? I mean, sure... there might be one or two people with some novel ideas, but unfortunately no one has really had anything to meaningfully contribute to that thread in quite some time. Generally, it's yet another newbie who is absolutely convinced that he has the best reactor design EVAR... without consulting the original post which generally has one or more reactors which is strictly superior.
I've posted a few upgrades on that thread without realizing it was no longer supported, so the interest in getting it replaced seems valid to me.
I am not willing to do the effort myself, but I have a suggestion. Do it the capitalist way, competition. Post a competing thread with the same idea, starting with the same info, and actually update it with relevant designs. Everyone starts pointing people to the better thread, then a mod comes along and unstickies the outdated one and stickies yours. That's my 2 copper nuggets. I'd love to see my breeder designs in that thread, both hybrid and the upgrade to the standard. Thank you for being willing to maintain it.
A new list would be cool. I would have a suggestion: not only list vanilla IC2 reactors, but make a second cathegory underneath that suppports Gregstech Addon elements like the Reactor Planner v3 does.
I would also like to see it expanded to include cooling tower designs, with the new craze for CRCS reactors.
The problem is that CRCS designs really aren't all that cost effective in terms of EU/t per resource investment until you run it for extensive periods of time, due to the number of cooling towers which effectively multiply your initial resource investment.
i guess we have to contact a mod as he already gave his ok.
and if that is possible why not get it managed by 2-3 guys so it wont die soon and updates come fast.
they could make decisions based on what the forum wants considering layout and stuff.
Iam not updating the first post anymore someone else has to do it i dont have time for it.
Candidates:
Requia
I am ok with my thread and way to lazy for more.
i guess we have to contact a mod as he already gave his ok.
and if that is possible why not get it managed by 2-3 guys so it wont die soon and updates come fast.
they could make decisions based on what the forum wants considering layout and stuff.
Candidates:
RequiaI am ok with my thread and way to lazy for more.
I second the nomination, however I am also too occupied with Life and Stuff to maintain a thread that busy.
I was wondering already if ppl even read my posts XD.
I think its a good idea to have multiple ppl manage that topic. It takes quite some time checking each design to see if they can be added to the list. Especially if you have to read though 20 pages after a short vacation.
I could probably also do the job, but only the part where I maintain the thread, as I don't have a good idea which plan is good and which is not.
I am online very often though. Not too busy in real life yet. 
Proposition:
Anyone who wants to post a new design has to ALSO post the design in the list of good designs it is challenging for it to be considered, and why it is superior. Having proper submission formatting guidelines will also help cut down on the crap. These two will cut down the number of posts to be actually considered dramatically and make the workload manageable.
For example of formatting
Link To Reactor Design
EU/t:
Efficency:
# Chambers:
RESOURCES NEEDED (including -all- CRCS Cooling Towers):
Copper:
Tin:
Iron:
Gold:
DIamonds:
SUC
LHZ: (measured in seconds per lapis) / (total lapis used per cycle)
RSH: (measured in seconds per redstone) / (total redstone used per cycle)
CRCS cooling tower link
# cooling towers needed:
Heat Cooled/Second
BREEDER INFORMATION:
# Isotopes enriched per uranium
Heat Neutral: (Y/N)
Does not need uranium cells to reach optimal heat levels: (Y/N)
yes , there is not much stuff to check if it is better,
just output, eu, eff, buildingcost, maintaining cost.
And you can always contact me if you have doubt with a design,
maybe also ShneekyTheLost.
agreed to shneekey
as for now the List of "moderators"
Requia
Industrial Miner
optional
ShneekyTheLost
Skavier470
PS: I contacted our almighty dragonlord to ask what possibelities we have regarding Ricks thread.
