Filling with ic2:te blocks

webberjo · Aug 23rd 2019

I can give myself ic2:te blocks simple enough with /give @p ic2:te <amount> <state> (example: /give @p ic2:te 1 46 will give me 1 Iron Furnace), but how do I use ic2:te blocks in the /fill command?

I tried /fill <x1> <y1> <z1> <x2> <y2> <z2> ic2:te 46 but it tells me 46 is too big and the number must be at most 15. Using a number from 0 to 15 just fills the specified area with untextured blocks called "ic2.te.name".

I tried /fill <x1> <y1> <z1> <x2> <y2> <z2> ic2:te#46 but it tells me there is no such block what that name.

Do ic2:te blocks just not work properly in the fill command?

albijoe · Aug 23rd 2019

Have you tried "te 1 46" like in the previous command?

KrisBigK · Aug 24th 2019

I don't think te blocks work properly in commands and structure blocks at all. I remember that I filed a bug report about this in Feb. 2018, but I can't find the bug report now. (maybe 2325 and 2335 as they are the missing ones in that period of time) My screenshots were still there though.

webberjo · Aug 24th 2019

Quote from albijoe

Have you tried "te 1 46" like in the previous command?

That's not how that works. The 1 in that /give command is for quantity and the 46 is for block state. The /fill command has no parameter for quantity and the block state parameter only accepts 0-15 whereas what I want is in the 40s.

KrisBigK · Aug 24th 2019

Well even if the command did successfully execute the blocks placed will be useless anyways. As for the block state parameter issue I suggest creating a bug report for it.

albijoe · Aug 31st 2019

I looked up the /fill command. If you type ic2: and then hit <Tab>, it will give you some options. It looks like it wants the name of the block, like IC2:glass.

Not sure which block you are looking to place. I was able to place ic2:glass, ic2:air, and ic2:distilled_water just fine.

KrisBigK · Aug 31st 2019

The problem is with ic2:te blocks (most are machines). Lacking the ability to place massive amounts of machines makes testing large builds in creative really annoying.

Chocohead · Sep 2nd 2019

All the vanilla block (re)placing commands trip over IC2's blocks which have TileEntities as they both fail to set the initial state properly then subsequently don't send the client information about the block(s). There was a work around for this in 1.8 in the form of a custom IC2 command which handled it correctly (as well as supporting placing blocks by name like the recipe files rather than ID) which clearly wasn't ported after the 1.9 update. Suppose it might be worth porting now if people want it again.

Filling with ic2:te blocks

Share

Users Viewing This Thread