[Addon 1.42] Iron Chests V0.9.5

lishid · Nov 22nd 2011

Just a quick update, I've recently been trying out Minecraft 1.0.0 and haven't progressed much.
I'm hoping to clear out some time by the end of this week to do some more coding to solve some of the issues I'm getting with SMP, mainly sending the password to identify.

RichardG · Nov 22nd 2011

lishid, sorry for the long time I took to reply, but the chests aren't in fact explosion-proof - I just asked you to make them explosion-proof

Ranakastrasz · Nov 22nd 2011

Does this work as a stand alone mod? If not, why?

FnordMan · Nov 22nd 2011

Quote from RichardG

lishid, sorry for the long time I took to reply, but the chests aren't in fact explosion-proof - I just asked you to make them explosion-proof

Note how he hasn't done an update since you requested this as well...
two fails here:
1: Patience
2: Observation/Reading

RichardG · Nov 22nd 2011

It's kind of a paradox. His reply to my post had a double meaning.

lishid · Nov 22nd 2011

Quote from RichardG

lishid, sorry for the long time I took to reply, but the chests aren't in fact explosion-proof - I just asked you to make them explosion-proof

Yeah, I agreed to make it explosion proof in the future versions.

Bjatta · Nov 24th 2011

Нарисовал сундуки в стиле Sphax для мода IronChests
Some chests for mod in Sphax style 128x
1. Алмазный (dimond )
2. Золотой (gold )
3. Железный (iron )
Просто закинуть в скин, в папку ic2/sprites

MasterEric · Nov 25th 2011

Question: I haven't taken the time to read the whole discussion, but when will you be able to open iron/gold/diamond chests with blocks on top of them?
I am a modder, and its sounds simple to change; just remove the bit of code that checks if there is a block above before opening.
If it is coming in the next update, please say so.
EDIT: BTW I use your mod on my server, its awesome! I'd just like to be able to stack chests on top of one another.

lishid · Nov 25th 2011

Quote from MasterEric

Question: I haven't taken the time to read the whole discussion, but when will you be able to open iron/gold/diamond chests with blocks on top of them?
I am a modder, and its sounds simple to change; just remove the bit of code that checks if there is a block above before opening.
If it is coming in the next update, please say so.
EDIT: BTW I use your mod on my server, its awesome! I'd just like to be able to stack chests on top of one another.

Yes, coming in the next update.

Geo Terra · Dec 1st 2011

Hey, lishid. I was browsing the MCF finding new mods to pad my mod collection when I ran across the mod: "More Storage" which has a password lock in it. Perhaps you could talk to the creator to find out how he coded the lock. It uses Forge.

Link: http://www.minecraftforum.net/…402-100-more-storage-v12/

lishid · Dec 1st 2011

Quote from ultimate_omega

Hey, lishid. I was browsing the MCF finding new mods to pad my mod collection when I ran across the mod: "More Storage" which has a password lock in it. Perhaps you could talk to the creator to find out how he coded the lock. It uses Forge.

Link: http://www.minecraftforum.net/…402-100-more-storage-v12/

That looks interesting, but It's non-SMP which is basically where I am at right now.

Charles Broughton · Dec 1st 2011

On SMP:

Code

Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Slot 251 is already occupied by ic2.common.BlockScaffold@75d252d when adding ic2.mod.ironchest.BlockVeryLargeChest@7433b121
	at qf.<init>(Block.java:51)
	at nx.<init>(BlockContainer.java:16)
	at ic2.mod.ironchest.BlockVeryLargeChest.<init>(BlockVeryLargeChest.java:13)
	at mod_IronChest.<clinit>(mod_IronChest.java:72)
	... 13 more

Even when the config is changed (taken from the above post, since your config does not generate if a block ID conflict occurs on first run... you should fix that too):

Code

# Configuration file
# Generated on 04/11/11 1:00 PM




###########
# General #
###########




general {
chestAnimation=true
}




#########
# Block #
#########




block {
blockDiamondChest=178
blockGoldChest=176
blockIronChest=175
}




########
# Item #
########




item {
guiDiamondChest=34
guiGoldChest=33
}

Display More

HeadHunter67 · Dec 1st 2011

Quote from lishid

That looks interesting, but It's non-SMP which is basically where I am at right now.

What's the point of a password in Single Player?

VoraciousPuma · Dec 1st 2011

Quote from HeadHunter67

What's the point of a password in Single Player?

Challenge maps, most likely.

lishid · Dec 2nd 2011

Quote from Charles Broughton

Use "blockVeryLargeChestChest=175" and remove

blockDiamondChest=178
blockGoldChest=176
blockIronChest=175

And yes, thanks for reporting the problem, it will be fixed in the next update.

Geo Terra · Dec 2nd 2011

Quote from lishid

That looks interesting, but It's non-SMP which is basically where I am at right now.

I figured I might point that out as I have decompiled both SSP and SMP, and minus the network communication code, the two are somewhat similar. I have been poking around inside the code to find a way to use MLMP and Forge to send the "combination" packets from client to server and back. Also, I thought it might give some inspiration.

If I hit something, I'll let you know.

lishid · Dec 2nd 2011

Quote from ultimate_omega

I figured I might point that out as I have decompiled both SSP and SMP, and minus the network communication code, the two are somewhat similar. I have been poking around inside the code to find a way to use MLMP and Forge to send the "combination" packets from client to server and back. Also, I thought it might give some inspiration.

If I hit something, I'll let you know.

Well What I think now is to use Modloader's packet to send the password to set/authenticate every time it's asked. Although I have been busy recently with some Bukkit plugins...

RichardG · Dec 8th 2011

Yeah, using Packet230s would be the best way to go.

Be sure to use server side authentication - if you send the password in the P230, people could easily hack their clients to get the password.

lishid · Dec 9th 2011

Quote from RichardG

Yeah, using Packet230s would be the best way to go.

Be sure to use server side authentication - if you send the password in the P230, people could easily hack their clients to get the password.

No need for auth. Client sends attempt pass to server, unless your network is being watched, nobody should catch your packet.

Carnanty · Dec 16th 2011

is there a way to make it compatible with inv tweeks?

Share