Just a quick update, I've recently been trying out Minecraft 1.0.0 and haven't progressed much.
I'm hoping to clear out some time by the end of this week to do some more coding to solve some of the issues I'm getting with SMP, mainly sending the password to identify.
[Addon 1.42] Iron Chests V0.9.5
- lishid
- Closed
-
lishid, sorry for the long time I took to reply, but the chests aren't in fact explosion-proof - I just asked you to make them explosion-proof
-
Does this work as a stand alone mod? If not, why?
-
lishid, sorry for the long time I took to reply, but the chests aren't in fact explosion-proof - I just asked you to make them explosion-proof
Note how he hasn't done an update since you requested this as well...
two fails here:
1: Patience
2: Observation/Reading -
It's kind of a paradox. His reply to my post had a double meaning.
-
lishid, sorry for the long time I took to reply, but the chests aren't in fact explosion-proof - I just asked you to make them explosion-proof
Yeah, I agreed to make it explosion proof in the future versions.
-
-
Question: I haven't taken the time to read the whole discussion, but when will you be able to open iron/gold/diamond chests with blocks on top of them?
I am a modder, and its sounds simple to change; just remove the bit of code that checks if there is a block above before opening.
If it is coming in the next update, please say so.
EDIT: BTW I use your mod on my server, its awesome!
I'd just like to be able to stack chests on top of one another. -
Question: I haven't taken the time to read the whole discussion, but when will you be able to open iron/gold/diamond chests with blocks on top of them?
I am a modder, and its sounds simple to change; just remove the bit of code that checks if there is a block above before opening.
If it is coming in the next update, please say so.
EDIT: BTW I use your mod on my server, its awesome! I'd just like to be able to stack chests on top of one another.Yes, coming in the next update.
-
Hey, lishid. I was browsing the MCF finding new mods to pad my mod collection when I ran across the mod: "More Storage" which has a password lock in it. Perhaps you could talk to the creator to find out how he coded the lock. It uses Forge.
Link: http://www.minecraftforum.net/…402-100-more-storage-v12/
-
On SMP:
CodeCaused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Slot 251 is already occupied by ic2.common.BlockScaffold@75d252d when adding ic2.mod.ironchest.BlockVeryLargeChest@7433b121 at qf.<init>(Block.java:51) at nx.<init>(BlockContainer.java:16) at ic2.mod.ironchest.BlockVeryLargeChest.<init>(BlockVeryLargeChest.java:13) at mod_IronChest.<clinit>(mod_IronChest.java:72) ... 13 moreEven when the config is changed (taken from the above post, since your config does not generate if a block ID conflict occurs on first run... you should fix that too):
Code
Display More# Configuration file # Generated on 04/11/11 1:00 PM ########### # General # ########### general { chestAnimation=true } ######### # Block # ######### block { blockDiamondChest=178 blockGoldChest=176 blockIronChest=175 } ######## # Item # ######## item { guiDiamondChest=34 guiGoldChest=33 } -
That looks interesting, but It's non-SMP which is basically where I am at right now.
What's the point of a password in Single Player?
-
What's the point of a password in Single Player?
Challenge maps, most likely. -
That looks interesting, but It's non-SMP which is basically where I am at right now.I figured I might point that out as I have decompiled both SSP and SMP, and minus the network communication code, the two are somewhat similar. I have been poking around inside the code to find a way to use MLMP and Forge to send the "combination" packets from client to server and back. Also, I thought it might give some inspiration.
If I hit something, I'll let you know.
-
Yeah, using Packet230s would be the best way to go.
Be sure to use server side authentication - if you send the password in the P230, people could easily hack their clients to get the password.
-
Yeah, using Packet230s would be the best way to go.
Be sure to use server side authentication - if you send the password in the P230, people could easily hack their clients to get the password.
No need for auth. Client sends attempt pass to server, unless your network is being watched, nobody should catch your packet. -
is there a way to make it compatible with inv tweeks?
