Microcycle reactors are reactors that works in small bursts, then cool down for a while. It allows to have little or no internal cooling components, usually just being a big pile of uranium in thin sheet of metal.
What is good about them?
First, they are most efficient. You can even reach theoretical maximum of 4.44 effectiveness, though it is not really practical.
Second, they are cheap in everything, except uranium. For them, uranium is not just fuel - it is constructive part, because they can run 80+ hours from one load.
Third, low maintenance. As I said, 80+hours per load, so you just make it, connect and forget about it. Like a solar/wind/water, but much more beefy.
And last, they are very safe. CASUC reactors have a lot of parts where something can go wrong. Mark-2 reactors can blow up if you forget to wait for it to cool down. For microcycle reactors, wiring is extremely simple, and human factor is minimum.
And there is one, but serious drawback. It is amount of uranium you need to get it started. Recommended is 27 per core, and it produces just 24.8 Eu/t (but for a long long time). So, if you need your Quantum here and now, it is not a best option.
Now about how it is done.
Simplest scheme is flow-limiter. You make a reactor with average 32Eu/t, or little more, or very little bellow (everything above 31.5 is ok). Then you filter output of it through single BatBox, not letting reactor run until BatBox is empty. EU part is simple - all you need is downconvert ouput to low voltage without loss. Redstone part is even simpler and consisting of one redstone torch and two redstone dusts. Batbox is set to "emit if empty". Redstone torch is sticked into it, effectively being lit when batbox is NOT empty. And redstone wire goes straight into reactor chamber. As a bonus, it also switches reactor off if there is nothing on the other side that can take energy.
On first picture there is a two-chamber flow-limited reactor. Load is following -
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…n2kxe1ezyn7nl3wesro3ptsn4
There are two drawbacks, though. First, you are limited to 32Eu/t designs. You can make it work with other, of cause, with some splitomancy, but it defeats the idea simplicity.
Second - it does not work well with more than one reactor. Main reason is that reactors update once per second, and not synchronously with each other. So, you have to use more complex wiring to extend working period enough to allow all rectors to emit energy. And that, again, defeats the simplicity.
Nevertheless, I could make a quad core one that worked for many hours without exploding - see picture 2. 4 cores make nearly 100 EU/t, which is then cplit by 3, with "control" batbox receiving 33EU/t. Three repeaters extend "on" time to about one second.
So, now about "real" way to do microcycle. And that is - run a plant of many cores from one redwire and fed into one system of transformers/storages.
It can be done simply with timer. It should give "off" output for short period of time (couple of second), and then "on" for much longer period of time.
For example, for chamberless full-out uranium reactor ratio is 29 (divide "Active" EU/t by "Effective")
http://www.talonfiremage.pwp.b…vpaz1bc5mrejn58u1tja9kif4
So, if you want "on" period to be 2 seconds, "off" should be 2*29=58 seconds.
There are different ways to do that. If you have redpower, just use it's timers. Picture 3 has an example schematics. Timer of the left is "long" one (58 seconds in our example), timer on the right is "short" (2 seconds).
Thingie on the far right is just a "or" gate that can be replaced with one redstone wire. It is needed because redpower wire does not go "into" blocks. I learned it hard way - it was only time reactor blew in my face without me intending it:(
Or you can make timer from just Industrialcraft compenents. And it will look very cool.
I present you a Cubeclock! See pictures 4 and 5.
Because of oh so informative looks of Industrialcraft storage and transformers, it is better to tell what it is in words.
It is two parallel rings of BatBoxes and LVTs. They are connected so electricity can go only in one direction - clockwise, for example. So, in both rings direction of BB output should be clockwise, and direction of LVTs should be counter-clockwise (because it's their "input").
One ring is one-quarter rotated to another, so there is a BB of one rings against LVT of another.
Each BB is set to "Emit if empty" and have a torch sticked to it that transmit signal to LVT of other ring.
Rings "work" in order. Usually there are three of four BBs non-empty, so there is only one LVT allowing EU through. When all EU transimted, then BB before that LVTs becomes empty, unlocking other ring.
So, long story short, put 1200 EU in one ring and 18000 in another. Batteries give energy in 100 EU packets, so it is relatively easy to do it with them.
Then connect torch sticking of "lower EU" ring to zero-core all-uranium reactors. Mission accomplished.
Math for it is following. Complete cycle for Cubeclock consists of for cycles - two for one ring and two for other. Length of each ring cycle is 1 tic per 32 eu in it, or 1 second per 640 eu.
Torch on one BB is unlit for length, of it's ring cycle, plus three or four lag.
So, if we want two second "on" cycle, we put 2*640 = 1280 EU. Then we remove 80 EU to compensate that lag.
Now, "off" cycle should be 2*29=58 seconds. But it consists of two "big" ring and one "small" ring cycle. So, we should substract from that time duration of "off" time and then divide remainder by two. (58-2)/2=28 seconds. After multiplying by 640 and rounding we have 18000 EU.
Hopefully someone can understand it:)
Next time may be I'll discuss best way to place dozens of reactors in small space. "Forest" allows better wiring, but is hard to water properly. "Wall" is much easier to water, but harder to wire, etc.
EDIT: Any idea why that goddamn url BBCodes are not working?