Would it be possible to make the shield recognize thaumcraft wisps as hostile mobs (and kill them with the anti-mob upgrade)?
hmm now that you mention it, it does ring a bell^^ ..although i don't quite remember =P ..any opinion about the idea?
You already have a more violent/hayoish alternative to Interdiction Torches - Tesla Coilz
Tesla coils can hurt me as well and aren't too nice to light up my house.
On a practical level, why should a luminator have repellent properties?
Did you even read my second paragraph?
This is about giving Luminators some attractive quality, so people actually decide to use them. Once you have other mods installed there is absolutely nothing that justifies their existence.
As in the title.
Since there is no direct way to up the light range (which has been requested a lot), Luminators could be made a lot more attractive by giving them the ability to repel mobs in a certain area. (like EE2 interdiction torches used to)
Some sort of explanation could be that we assume they give off "daylight" which mobs obviously don't like and therefore avoid. Just instead of lighting them on fire it keeps/(pushes) them away.
Thats what i have suggested earlier (somewhere) but got ignored. I'd like if luminators spread light a bit farther than factorization wrath lamps, so it can compete and be really useful to light huge areas, for a few EU.
I strongly support this. The way luminators currently work gives them no benefit over any other light source. The way i see it, they'd need to be upped to the level of a wrath lamp or beyond (since they aren't an infinite light source but require energy). And the creator of factorization probably wouldn't mind if the same system was used in IC2.
Or you could give them some mob repelling quality much like the equivalent exchange interdiction torches used to be. (should i post this as a seperate idea?)
Luminators just need some kind of benefit because, let's be honest, who uses them right now dominantly over any other light source?
The IDs should be fine as long as you didn't change the config files (and they still match the client) ..did you add any other mod that might occupy that space now? (maybe some new vanilla blocks took that place?)
i can confirm that it works, there's barely any 1.4.6 mod that isn't compatible with 1.4.7
Btw do you have it as something like an IC2 addon in mind (since it's posted here =P ) or as a stand-alone mod? ...It'd be amazing to have a ship that uses some sort of fuel/electricity (IC2 Eu and/or buildcraft oil?) to fly. I've been waiting for something like that and just thinking about it gets me all excited XD ..i want to build my nuclear powered flying base(-ship)
I think he meant something more closely to the "zeppelin mod"..a bit more "mobile/versatile" than rp2 frames. Personally, i will start throwing money at you if you manage to get something like that for SMP. (and less crashy than the zeppelin mod)
You can quote me on that^^ ..i will start throwing money!
I'll look into it, thanks for the info! And i agree, using fuel is more fun. Currently i do that with the petrogen addon and forestry biogen.
This has been suggested in many shapes and forms already. Search before posting.
Honestly, you're probably right, as i only read through GregTech a while ago and decided that i didn't like certain things ..but maybe, if i work through the config, it'll become more appealing.
Other than that there was nothing to read between the lines of my other post, since i already noticed that "big" additions like that will be kind of denied/ignored by default in any case, even if the idea (not specifically this one) is a valid one. The most this suggestion board is able to change are minor game play mechanics.
okay, seeing how many other people kept responding, you weren't entirely clear about that..
"[ForgeModLoader] FML appears to be missing any signature data. This is not a good thing"
Create a fresh jar
(get a clean jar from minecraft.net and reinstall recommended forge)
do you understand i dont need anymore help?
nothing happened when i tried installing, absolutetly nothing
but now it s done
GOOD for you, and how exactly was i (or anyone else) supposed to know that? You obviously didn't say anything.
Quoted from "stm91"
There's already 2 mode providing Fusion Reactor: Rocket Science (nout updated yet) and GregTech. If this is not enough for you, don't complain ...
Firstly, last time i checked there's no SMP support in Rocket science and secondly, i already stated my opinion about GergTech. Also, i wasn't complaining, i merely stated that i like THIS idea. If it was an addon that only added this i'd love to have it on my server.
hey, i've found a minor typo in your interface =P ..sorry if this already has been reported.
Typ -> Type (a german "false friend" i suppose..or really just a typo^^)
(also, you might want to add a space in between "Powerleft"
i, personally, like the idea and not everyone wants to have greg-tech installed
1:get the most recent version of java 32 and 64 bit (some things might still need 32bit)
---get rid of ANY old ones---
with multi mc:
2:create new instance with wanted mc version (f.e. 1.4.5)
3:start instance (to make it download original mc.jar)
4:edit instance mods
5:put compatible forge (also f.e. 1.4.5) into "MINECRAFT.JAR" tab
6:start mc for test
7:edit instance mods
8:add compatible ic2 (f.e. ..you guessed it, 1.4.5) into "MODS FOLDER" tab ...NOT core mods
..this isn't entirely related to what Aethir said since he didn't contribute anything to the original idea (although i don't see anything wrong with the info he added since some people might not know about the factorization suit and might be interested)...
BUT i love you get flamed if you repost an idea, but at the same time everyone bedevils "necroposting" .. so what would please you guys? ..if an idea isn't fully worthy of a new thread, yet adds something to a similar one that might alter it in a nice way? i'd really love to hear some guidelines
(happened to me and i did, in fact, add something to an idea)
edit: also, if it's that much of burden, just lock the threads which are too "dead"...