[Suggestion]Iridium + Uranium + misc = H-bomb

MJEvans · Apr 14th 2012

Iridium + Uranium + misc = H-bomb

The H-bomb would be more destructive, so destructive that it wouldn't drop any item blocks at all.

Setting off an H-bomb should cause several times, maybe a full order of magnitude more, damage strength than a normal nuke. It should also set -anything- flammable that's within 2-4x that radius on fire.

passinglurker · Apr 14th 2012

-1

nukes already push the limit of lag IMO

MagusUnion · Apr 14th 2012

When Kenington can get around to updating Rocket Science for Thermo-nukes, he will... just be patient...

GregoriusT · Apr 14th 2012

Quote from passinglurker

-1

nukes already push the limit of lag IMO

The LAG is caused by Items laying in the Crater, but he said absolutely NO ITEMS laying around.

But like MagusUnion said: Wait for Rocketscienceupdate.

wasmic · Apr 15th 2012

And why should there be iridium in the recipe?
Heck, the only place you mentioned hydrogen itself was in the name "hydrogen bomb".
You probaply don't realise how complicated even a Teller-Ulam design is.

Nanomanz · Apr 16th 2012

Unnecessary, OP, too destructive.
-1

Dj_777 · Apr 20th 2012

Quote from Nanomanz

"Unnecessary, OP, too destructive."

Depends on the cost to determine if it's op. If it takes more resources than to make an entire quantumsuit & all the machines involved, then it's not op.

Unnecessary? Maybe. Awesome? Hell yeah. could be considered 'unnecessary', but people seem to like it...
Too destructive? New concept to me...

RichardG · Apr 21st 2012

Nukes are already pushing the limit, thermo-nukes from RS even more.

Share