Good to know. Will that be an update for 5.08 or will you make it part of 5.09?
That is more or less a bugfix, so 5.08.
I just notice more and more that i missed quite a bunch of bug reports because no one put them on github and i was more or less 2 weeks away or at last not coding.
Could we get a config option to turn off damage from having Lava Buckets in the inventory?
Could we get a config option to turn off damage from having Lava Buckets in the inventory?
I think there already is a config for that, just buried in MaterialProperties.cfg. I'm guessing that changing "D:lava_3.0=3.0" to "D:lava_3.0=0.0" might do what you want.
Could we get a config option to turn off damage from having Lava Buckets in the inventory?
Does allready exist: MaterialProperties.cfg / Heatdamage / Lava...
Does allready exist: MaterialProperties.cfg / Heatdamage / Lava...
Okay, thanks. I didn't know about the entry in that file. 
I made sure to report my latest known bug on Github just now. Presently I been getting bear to make scripts to workaround it. Dream-master said it was caused by IC2 changing all it's meta-data.
Could you add a better version of the fluid regulator? For optimal flow in my plasma generator i would have to input 1,47mb/t, but thats impossible with the IC2 one...
So, I filled my two Large Tungstensteel Boilers with Distilled water and BOOM! Like there's no water...
Is that Intended? I'll use normal water for now...
Could you add a better version of the fluid regulator? For optimal flow in my plasma generator i would have to input 1,47mb/t, but thats impossible with the IC2 one...
When you're trying to get fluids to transfer to 2 decimal places you know you're using GT.
Could you add a better version of the fluid regulator? For optimal flow in my plasma generator i would have to input 1,47mb/t, but thats impossible with the IC2 one...
When one is not enough, use two. Or three, or four...
Could you add a better version of the fluid regulator? For optimal flow in my plasma generator i would have to input 1,47mb/t, but thats impossible with the IC2 one...
No but you can put in 30 mB/s which is only 2% off. Also the LHE rounds to the mB/s. I don't know if the turbines do as well but the actual desired optimal flow likely does so it should meet it.
Could you add a better version of the fluid regulator? For optimal flow in my plasma generator i would have to input 1,47mb/t, but thats impossible with the IC2 one...
You could make 29mb/sec (1.47*20 = 29.4). 0.4bm/sec = 0.02mb/t difference. 0.02/1.47 = 1.36% difference from optimal.
If i remember that right the plasma generator consumes every tick, but i can try it. Maybe i could also feed 3mb/t to a buffer and split it there so only half of that would reach the turbine...
The turbine is rounding up to the next integer anyways. So 2mb/t is what it needs. Such low flow rates are really bad anyways because of stuff like this.
Can't you make Multiblocks check hatches every second instead every tick?
Just adjust it to consume 20x per sec, instead 1x per tick.
That way the rate would still be the same, but the math would be easier, and would have less rounding.
And I could throw away my fluid regulators on a lava pool, and relay only on GT pipes to regulate the flow.
As we are now, the even the lowest tier input hatch can manage a Large Turbine...
Can't you make Multiblocks check hatches every second instead every tick?
Just adjust it to consume 20x per sec, instead 1x per tick.
That way the rate would still be the same, but the math would be easier, and would have less rounding.And I could throw away my fluid regulators on a lava pool, and relay only on GT pipes to regulate the flow.
As we are now, the even the lowest tier input hatch can manage a Large Turbine...
Afaik the hatch and bus tiers all behave exactly the same. As long as they're big enough for your requirements and meet the multiblocks spec they should have the same throughput.
I've tested up to 32 B/s through an LV hatch (double its capacity). I haven't tried more yet though I'd be surprised if there was a limit to throughput based on size. I don't think it would be intentional at least.
I agree with switching to seconds because right now it's difficult to make the large turbines happy (though it can be done, just with very few options). I'm not sure I'd want to switch to just using GT pipes with no fluid regulators in any actual setup even if the math was done in mB/s though...
Afaik the hatch and bus tiers all behave exactly the same. As long as they're big enough for your requirements and meet the multiblocks spec they should have the same throughput.
I've tested up to 32 B/s through an LV hatch (double its capacity). I haven't tried more yet though I'd be surprised if there was a limit to throughput based on size. I don't think it would be intentional at least.
Did you inputed 32B/s or 1600l/t?
Because outputing 32B/S using a regulators would require 32 regulators; And GT pipes list their output as seconds, but they don't output this quantity each seconds; It's about half capacity, two times p/sec.
So a 32B/s Pipe would output 16B two times each second (I think), and that is within the 16B capacity from the LV hatch.
If you regulated 1600l/t (32B/s), than it is consumed so fast that this capacity doesn't even matter;
I agree with switching to seconds because right now it's difficult to make the large turbines happy (though it can be done, just with very few options). I'm not sure I'd want to switch to just using GT pipes with no fluid regulators in any actual setup even if the math was done in mB/s though...
If it was consumed each second, I believe that pipes alone would work perfectly. In my tests, their output per second matches a regulator, the problem is when things are calculated less than one time per second...
Btw, fluid regulator set to some L/sec outputs liquids every tick. We can set speed in L/sec or L/tick, but it is speed, not frequency.
Someone mentioned there were some inquiries about stuff I may have coded here. Just a friendly reminder that you should submit any bugs/problems at https://github.com/Blood-Asp/GT5-Unofficial/issues. I check github hourly during the day and respond promptly if its something I can address.
If you have any questions or suggestions that aren't suitable to github feel free to drop me a PM on the FTB forum. I may or may not get PMs here, think I'm blocking them at the moment. I'm not current on what's going on in this thread in the slightest so I won't know unless you bring it to my attention.
Thanks and happy Monday
PS: If anyone (pleasant) here has been working a lot with Large Turbines and frequents the FTB forum and wants to drop me a line, I need feedback on some numbers. Plzthx.
I finally have arrived at the point of time where I want to play minecraft again. Say, I can just use this in collaboration with the standart shit like railcraft, forestry, etc? No fancy tricks necessary?
