It appears that the standalone planner still generates links with the "-G" in them thus they won't work anymore.
Those Links are being accepted by the Offline Planner, just to mention. Its always better to use the Offline Version. That saves Internet. We dont have much Internet on this Planet, so its friggin expensive these Days.
*cough*.. oops, lemme fix that 
After testing some things, I found out that your Planner doesnt work correctly with Plutonium and Thorium.
I test the Designs in my Computer Cube and most of them cause explosions, after they got labeled "Full Cycle", by your Planner.
I dont know how you coded that applet, so I cant give hints to fix that. All I can say is, that you should run it through the ComputerCube to proof that it works correctly. 
Should the 30K coolant cells and the 60K coolant cells share the same image?
EDIT: Nevermind, I didn't notice the like 6 pixel difference between the two
After testing some things, I found out that your Planner doesnt work correctly with Plutonium and Thorium.
I test the Designs in my Computer Cube and most of them cause explosions, after they got labeled "Full Cycle", by your Planner.
I dont know how you coded that applet, so I cant give hints to fix that. All I can say is, that you should run it through the ComputerCube to proof that it works correctly.
Heh, the planner rounded down, your components round up.
A simple rounding Error can cause explosions in under 8 Minutes, in comparsion to Full Cycle of 13 Hours? Interessting.
A simple rounding Error can cause explosions in under 8 Minutes, in comparsion to Full Cycle of 13 Hours? Interessting.
Do you have one of those perilous designs handy to look at?
This could be an example. The computercube says it will explode in 593 seconds and that is even when it would be a 6-chamber reactor with a max heat of 10,000. I think the heat generation value's are wrong. When I run this for 1 second in-game, the hull has 1008 heat in stead of the predicted 896 heat. Hope it helps.
Minor bug: heating cells resource cost is calculated incorrectly. It shows the same cost increase for 1 heating cell as 64.
talonius can you do me a favor and implement a feature to simulate already heaten up cooling cells?
that would be realy nice.
Can you update the reactor to reflect the reduction in thorium multicell price? (Copper ingots instead of dense copper plates).
ignore this
Turns out my security settings are blocking V4 from running at all, even though I have Chrome set to allow all sites to run java. I even made an exception and it still won't allow me. Weird.
Turns out my security settings are blocking V4 from running at all, even though I have Chrome set to allow all sites to run java. I even made an exception and it still won't allow me. Weird.
1. There is a V4?
2. You and two, try not to necropost :p
Is anyone able to host a verison of the reactor planner from TalonFire. The website is no longer active
Thanks
It would make more sense to host the new one rather than keep one that doesn't fully work anymore: IC2 Experimental Reactor Planner open beta
The Link No Longer Seems To Work, Can Someone Get Me A Working Link? Also, Does This Planner Work For IC2 Classic? As I Mostly Play That Version And I Would Like A 
Planner For It.
The Link No Longer Seems To Work, Can Someone Get Me A Working Link? Also, Does This Planner Work For IC2 Classic? As I Mostly Play That Version And I Would Like A
Don't think it's hosted online anywhere anymore, but there's always the jar you can run yourself. And yes it applies to IC2 classic too, although it doesn't have any of the new fuel rods or separate steam reactors.
The Link No Longer Seems To Work, Can Someone Get Me A Working Link? Also, Does This Planner Work For IC2 Classic? As I Mostly Play That Version And I Would Like A
Yes the planner is working for ic2classic. Like Chocohead said.
Only thing i have to mention: IC2 Classic also has also a intigrated reactor planner since 1.2.0.0 which also works through modpacks/mc versions (not bound to any mc version) but it is not as advanced as talons (so each has his ups/downs)
