1. Forum
  2. Wiki
  3. Bugtracker
  4. Blog
  5. Members
    1. Recent Activities
    2. Users Online
    3. Team
    4. Search Members
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Forum
  • Pages
  • More Options
  1. IC² Forum
  2. Forum
  3. IndustrialCraft²
IC2 Experimental builds (jenkins):
v2.0/2.1/2.2 / 2.3 / 2.5 / 2.6 / 2.7 / 2.8 (For Minecraft 1.6.4/1.7.2/1.7.10 / 1.8.9 / 1.9.4 / 1.10 / 1.11 / 1.12)
IndustrialCraft² recent version: v1.117!

Minecraft 1.5

  • Sinnaj63
  • November 26, 2012 at 8:58 PM
  • Closed
  • RichardG
    Uranium Miner
    Reactions Received
    17
    Posts
    1,947
    • November 30, 2012 at 1:22 PM
    • #21

    I've followed a few conversations between cpw and Grum. cpw clearly wants to grasp the API

    • Quote
  • Two
    Builder
    Reactions Received
    4
    Posts
    255
    • November 30, 2012 at 1:48 PM
    • #22

    I would love to actually see something of this mysterious API they keep bragging about. As someone who has some experience with API design I don't really see how they are going to offer all those features promised at Minecon without rewriting the entire code from scratch.

    As someone who has some experience with management I however work by the statement: "If there is nothing on the table, then there is nothing on the table." Too many "promises" have turned out to be pure vapor-ware to take people talking serious.

    • Quote
  • Surma
    Tree Cutter
    Posts
    8
    • December 2, 2012 at 8:53 AM
    • #23

    Why don't they just bring aboard the forge people and put it in the official release?

    • Quote
  • Two
    Builder
    Reactions Received
    4
    Posts
    255
    • December 2, 2012 at 10:48 AM
    • #24

    I am not sure if that works out well. It's like if you put people from the kindergarden and some who just graduated from college together and say: here do a project. It may lack some team-coordination. ;)

    • Quote
  • CrafterOfMines57
    Miner Of Diamond
    Posts
    1,458
    Location
    The Great Islands of Nigeria
    • December 2, 2012 at 2:50 PM
    • #25
    Quote from Surma

    Why don't they just bring aboard the forge people and put it in the official release?

    Because with how often Forge updates, it would be near impossible to keep making changes to the code as often as Forge does.

    Is the answer to this question no?

    Quote

    Hey don't take it so hard. Ignorance is part of this generation it seems. -the wise words of XFmax-o-l

    • Quote
  • RockRaiderZulu
    (too long, look at sig)
    Reactions Received
    1
    Posts
    193
    • December 2, 2012 at 10:58 PM
    • #26

    Why not an overarching API to isolate the current API's from the update cycle?

    A Rock Raider trained as an Engineer, among other things.

    • Quote
  • Two
    Builder
    Reactions Received
    4
    Posts
    255
    • December 4, 2012 at 11:24 AM
    • #27
    Quote from RockRaiderZulu

    Why not an overarching API to isolate the current API's from the update cycle?


    "Another API layer should do it" - If a manager tells you this as the result of a meeting you know that you are a) doomed and b) you will have to rewrite the code 3 month after that "this will solve it" layer is finished and released. Thats like if you bring your car to a mechanic because it is broken, but instead of fixing it he tells you to just take the bus instead and then hands you the bill.

    • Quote
  • Zjarek
    Tree Cutter
    Posts
    87
    • December 7, 2012 at 4:37 PM
    • #28

    Who cares about modding API, performance, bugs or redstone rework to make it actually useful in vanilla, the most important feature is of course fireworks: http://mojang.com/2012/12/minecraft-snapshot-12w49a/ . Bats weren't useless enough?

    • Quote
  • Sinnaj63
    Retired Shitposter|Globalist Conspiracy
    Reactions Received
    2
    Posts
    1,033
    • December 7, 2012 at 4:55 PM
    • #29
    Quote from Zjarek

    Who cares about modding API, performance, bugs or redstone rework to make it actually useful in vanilla, the most important feature is of course fireworks: http://mojang.com/2012/12/minecraft-snapshot-12w49a/ . Bats weren't useless enough?

    Display Spoiler

    YEAH!
    THE BEST UPDATE EVRER!
    WITH FIREWORKS I CAN FINISH MY TEKKIT PARTY

    Add me on Steam!

    • Quote
  • GregoriusT
    inactive IC² and GT Dev
    Reactions Received
    184
    Posts
    6,253
    Location
    not here anymore
    • December 7, 2012 at 5:19 PM
    • Official Post
    • #30

    1.4.6!?!
    NO MOJANG. DONT MAKE A FRIGGIN 1.4.6-UPDATE!!!

    I hate it to update MCP. Especially the NEI-Source! Cant you just stop it? This Version doesnt have serious Bugs, we dont need an Update of it AGAIN!!!

    • Previous Official Post
    • Next Official Post
    • Quote
  • Sinnaj63
    Retired Shitposter|Globalist Conspiracy
    Reactions Received
    2
    Posts
    1,033
    • December 7, 2012 at 6:01 PM
    • #31

    People spam about minecart bugs on other forums. But I woul lik to se thr next update in 3 month+, so that I can update all my mods to 1.4.5 before.

    Add me on Steam!

    • Quote
  • Geo Terra
    Lead Miner
    Posts
    1,203
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    • December 7, 2012 at 7:08 PM
    • #32
    Quote from GregoriusT

    1.4.6!?!
    NO MOJANG. DONT MAKE A FRIGGIN 1.4.6-UPDATE!!!

    I hate it to update MCP. Especially the NEI-Source! Cant you just stop it? This Version doesnt have serious Bugs, we dont need an Update of it AGAIN!!!

    I might create an instance for 1.4.6 just to check it out, but I hope to friggin god that Eloraam says "screw 1.4.6" and sticks a RedPower2 release for 1.4.5. I've been virtually dying to install Redpower2 on my 1.4.5 instance.

    • Quote
  • luacs1998
    ForgeEssentials developer
    Reactions Received
    1
    Posts
    42
    • December 8, 2012 at 6:14 AM
    • #33
    Quote from Zjarek

    Who cares about modding API, performance, bugs or redstone rework to make it actually useful in vanilla, the most important feature is of course fireworks: http://mojang.com/2012/12/minecraft-snapshot-12w49a/ . Bats weren't useless enough?

    YOU. HAVE. GOT. TO. BE. KIDDING. ME!!!

    • Quote
  • Two
    Builder
    Reactions Received
    4
    Posts
    255
    • December 8, 2012 at 8:17 AM
    • #34

    Whats the big issue with upgrading mods to 1.4.6?

    • Quote
  • Alblaka
    IC² Project Leader
    Reactions Received
    35
    Posts
    2,755
    • December 8, 2012 at 11:16 AM
    • Official Post
    • #35
    Quote from Two

    Whats the big issue with upgrading mods to 1.4.6?

    Need to resetup your MCP-environment. Again.
    Takes time. Again.
    Adds new bugs. Again.

    I doubt there will be that much of incode change, but it will still take a couple of hours and IS annoying at some point. I mean... FIREWORKS?!

    Greetz,
    Alblaka

    • Previous Official Post
    • Next Official Post
    • Quote
  • Two
    Builder
    Reactions Received
    4
    Posts
    255
    • December 8, 2012 at 12:53 PM
    • #36
    Quote from Alblaka

    Need to resetup your MCP-environment. Again.
    Takes time. Again.
    Adds new bugs. Again.

    I doubt there will be that much of incode change, but it will still take a couple of hours and IS annoying at some point. I mean... FIREWORKS?!


    Have I recently mentioned that you need more people? ;)

    Someone for example who can setup your Jenkins server to automatically download MCP & latest Forge, then compiles and sends you a bug report if any?

    • Quote
  • RockRaiderZulu
    (too long, look at sig)
    Reactions Received
    1
    Posts
    193
    • December 8, 2012 at 5:11 PM
    • #37

    *send complaints to jeb_

    Guess there is a human API for modders.

    A Rock Raider trained as an Engineer, among other things.

    • Quote
  • jrel_kor
    Tree Cutter
    Posts
    1
    • December 24, 2012 at 7:06 PM
    • #38

    I wouldn't be too concern with the 1.5 release making some mods obsolete (i.e. Railcraft). Every single time Mojang released a "Mod-wrecking" update, it has always been an ***extremely*** watered down version. (i.e. enderchests ( only one type of chest with no way to set any select "Frequency" (i.e. Everyone on the server has the same shared inventory) and **no Ender Pouches!!!), just to name on off the top of my head. There are others) I 'Never' use vanilla EnderChests. Why use something that the original mod makes obsolete since before the update itself even came out?
    So don't fret over the loss of RailCraft, I'm sure that RailCraft isn't going anywhere. RailCraft offers way too many things to become obsolete by a single MC update. Mojang may try to kill off some mods, but try as they might, they'll never match the quality of the original mods. And that is what we as the people who use these mods love, the quality of the mods, the intricacies and possibilities that these mods add to the whole vanilla experience. It is that that Mojang cannot match. They have created this fine game, but the modders have given it a dimension that cannot be equaled by any updates that coud potentially come out.

    Just my thoughts. Sorry for being so long-winded.

    • Quote
  • Two
    Builder
    Reactions Received
    4
    Posts
    255
    • December 25, 2012 at 12:54 PM
    • #39

    They do have some kind of a vision for Minecraft which is pretty low tech. I for myself for example don't use certain mods (like the Ender Chest mod) just because they make things too easy. As everyone still has the option to install that Ender Chest mod afterwards if they are not satisfied with a low-tech Enderchest, that is fine for everyone, but if they put in the high-tech chest right into vanilla, then its unlikely that there will be a mod to downgrade that thing.

    • Quote
  • Rick
    Master engineer
    Reactions Received
    3
    Posts
    1,086
    Location
    Netherlands
    • December 25, 2012 at 11:16 PM
    • #40

    Well the redstone changes are good but i wish they focused more on mod support.

    Official list of good reactor designs:
    [OFFICIAL] List of good reactor designs

    • Quote

Users Viewing This Thread

  • 1 Guest
  1. Privacy Policy
Powered by WoltLab Suite™