i think the reactors moved in the right direction in some ways, and not in others.
-i'd like to see the passive cooling restored to the reactor, even if it is a set value. nothing stores heat with 100% efficiency. If my reactor can store heat indefinitely even while empty, then i want my induction furnace to do the same. Agreed. But only a small amount.
-i wouldn't mind seeing reactors converted to steam...but IC2 needs to be able to stand alone. sounds like a variant when RC is installed. this could also double as a cooling system in which the more water you dump, the more steam you could produce, but it also cools the reactor. In the latest version, check the configs (must have RC installed).
-i'm torn on the piping items. it gives reactors a feel of realism and complexity, but once again IC2 needs to be able to stand alone. IC2 should have some sort of system for reactor components. I always thought "colored" slots that only accepted certain items would be useful.
-i really don't care for the ability to keep heat off the hull and store it only in components, especially when i find that it is a highly effective design. But with the hull not passively self-cooling anymore, why should i bother with transferring heat to the hull anyway. As storage maybe?
-i like the fallout from exploded reactors
-i like that the reactor now defaults to "off." having to scramble to restore a redstone signal because of a single misplaced bucket of water got old. Agreed
-i think there isn't a good component to move heat between the hull and components fast enough for higher end reactors. it throws off my temperature readings and judgement when i turn the reactor off and the hull temp is still rising because the hull is trying to catch up(or vice versa). this can result in a reactor that was shut down blowing up a short time (10+ sec) later. i think this makes the reactors more volatile.
-i don't like the heat exchangers. heat disperses naturally, and can be aided. i shouldn't have to rely on a component to move heat. I like the idea, its like having a heat sink on your PC. Heat does go away naturally, but the CPU makes way more than can be passively removed so the heat sink gives it a boost.
-i think the reactor image is slow to update. a reactor can go from cold to boom in a matter of seconds, why does it take 8-10 seconds for the flames and smoke to start. (not sure if this can be fixed) i use nuclear control for much of my scram-codes, but as a standalone mod, you have no real way of knowing how much heat you have and where quickly.
this is my imput towards the reactors. i enjoy useing them, and i enjoy their successes (and failures). However, i think the system could use another overhaul.
XP---->Vista----->Windows 7
-----------^
we are here with reactors right now.
Nope, we're in the Windows 7 stage. Reactors are cool!